Mr VJP Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 They're upset about not having fracking. Throw in the passage of the SAFE Act and they surely would be better off as part of PA. http://www.aol.com/article/2015/02/28/upstate-new-york-towns-consider-seceding-to-pennsylvania/21147840/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmaing10%7Cdl3%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D620689 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BizCT Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Lol Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATbuckhunter Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Now this is funny! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b3h Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 What r the county's, didn't see them mentioned Ol dog on a stray Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 It makes you wonder how long it would be before these same people would be whining and complaining about some of the features of PA. The grass always looks greener on the other side of the border.......until you actually live there. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Anyone notice the wind sock? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Single_shot Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 It makes you wonder how long it would be before these same people would be whining and complaining about some of the features of PA. The grass always looks greener on the other side of the border.......until you actually live there. I felt the same way when I bought the NY property so I could Sunday hunt.......then the taxes went up on the off grid glorified tent and cost more than my house and property here in Pa. where I am on the grid. I too thought it was greener on "the other side in NY". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr VJP Posted March 1, 2015 Author Share Posted March 1, 2015 When you look at the video, it shows the 4 counties. Basically, they are the ones that hit the NE corner of PA. Delaware County is in the middle. Personally, I think they should be looking to leave because of the SAFE Act. There is a HUGE difference between PA and NY when it comes to gun laws. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 not going to happen 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b3h Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 When you look at the video, it shows the 4 counties. Basically, they are the ones that hit the NE corner of PA. Delaware County is in the middle. Personally, I think they should be looking to leave because of the SAFE Act. There is a HUGE difference between PA and NY when it comes to gun laws. Blew rite past the video. Need to learn how to view. Thanks Agree abt the safe act it really sucks Ol dog on a stray Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr VJP Posted March 1, 2015 Author Share Posted March 1, 2015 To view the video, just click on the blue link in the post. Sullivan, Delaware, Broome & Tioga are the 4 with towns that want to leave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Anyone notice the wind sock? what's it doing or proving? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr VJP Posted March 1, 2015 Author Share Posted March 1, 2015 Just indicates which way the wind is blowing in case of a gas leak. Leaks are about non-existent, but regulations require it. Just had a house blow up from a city supplied gas leak in NJ last week. More to worry about if you have gas in your home than from a fracking well. They have wind socks at every airport too. Nothing sinister about those though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doewhacker Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Shouldn't this be in the politics forum where I don't have to see it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scolopaxmatt Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Not yet. But it's headed there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 (edited) Just indicates which way the wind is blowing in case of a gas leak. Leaks are about non-existent, but regulations require it. Just had a house blow up from a city supplied gas leak in NJ last week. More to worry about if you have gas in your home than from a fracking well. They have wind socks at every airport too. Nothing sinister about those though. oh, I was under the impression that the perceived dangers about fracking was what happens underground with the chemicals involved in it and not so much about the gas itself since that exists everywhere in NY already. Edited March 1, 2015 by jjb4900 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 what's it doing or proving? Refineries, chemical plants or any facility that has a potential for leaking toxic gasses have a wind sock so in case of emergencies, employees or emergency personnel can see which way the fumes are traveling. In this case, the wind is blowing right towards that farm house.How would you like to have that near your home & what would it do to your property value? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Refineries, chemical plants or any facility that has a potential for leaking toxic gasses have a wind sock so in case of emergencies, employees or emergency personnel can see which way the fumes are traveling. In this case, the wind is blowing right towards that farm house.How would you like to have that near your home & what would it do to your property value? I thought this was about Fracking...which was banned in NY because of the crap that's pumped into the ground in the process, do wind socks warn us of that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 (edited) I thought this was about Fracking...which was banned in NY because of the crap that's pumped into the ground in the process, do wind socks warn us of that? No I & some others have stated the purpose of wind socks. The point of the picture was would you want to live in that house assuming that the well was not paying you royalties? If the home owner sold the lease & is getting $$$ from the fracking then that is his choice, but what about those that have the misfortune of living next to a well that is upwind of them, in plain view & they aren't getting squat? How would you like that? Not to mention what it might be doing tom their well water. Edited March 1, 2015 by wildcat junkie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr VJP Posted March 1, 2015 Author Share Posted March 1, 2015 I'm sure their well water is being tested at least once a month to alleviate any concerns. I don't believe fracking wells give off any deadly gases, and the gas itself isn't especially dangerous when vented into the air. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 I'm sure their well water is being tested at least once a month to alleviate any concerns. I don't believe fracking wells give off any deadly gases, and the gas itself isn't especially dangerous when vented into the air. QUOTE: "As ExxonMobil’s CEO, it’s Rex Tillerson’s job to promote the hydraulic fracturing enabling the recent oil and gas boom, and fight regulatory oversight. The oil company is the biggest natural gas producer in the U.S., relying on the controversial drilling technology to extract it. The exception is when Tillerson’s $5 million property value might be harmed. Tillerson has joined a lawsuit that cites fracking’s consequences in order to block the construction of a 160-foot water tower next to his and his wife’s Texas home." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr VJP Posted March 1, 2015 Author Share Posted March 1, 2015 Sounds like he is objecting to the water tower by jumping on the band wagon about unproven consequences of fracking. He couldn't win the case if he just admitted he doesn't want to see the tower from his home's view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Sounds like he is objecting to the water tower by jumping on the band wagon about unproven consequences of fracking. He couldn't win the case if he just admitted he doesn't want to see the tower from his home's view. It's called NIMBY. Which was the point I was trying to get across. Reduced property values. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scolopaxmatt Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Unproven consequences? Seriously? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr VJP Posted March 1, 2015 Author Share Posted March 1, 2015 Seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.