ADK Native Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=&bn=S02450&term=2019&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y&Committee%26nbspVotes=Y&Floor%26nbspVotes=Y# I read supporters said this law was needed to protect children from accessing firearms to commit suicide. More children are dying from illegal drugs and texting while driving. So do we need a law that requires illegal drugs be locked up and cell phones be locked up while driving a motor vehicle? So the same politicians in New York State who claim to care so much about children dying from guns, support murdering children by abortion. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob-c Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 (edited) I actually am surprised it’s taken this long for the NY Democrats to start rolling out more useless gun laws. But as the saying gos never waist a tragedy, the shooting in California has everyone on guard again. Its only going to get worse guys.. Edited July 31, 2019 by rob-c 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rattler Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 I live alone. No kids in my house. So, I assume if my house is locked, I'm legal, no? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philoshop Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 1 hour ago, Rattler said: I live alone. No kids in my house. So, I assume if my house is locked, I'm legal, no? I'm in the same situation, Rattler. My entire house could be considered a "gun vault". And even the more stupid adults who somehow end up in my house are vociferously warned that every gun they see is loaded and ready. Stay away, and don't touch anything. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 18 hours ago, ADK Native said: https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=&bn=S02450&term=2019&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y&Committee%26nbspVotes=Y&Floor%26nbspVotes=Y# I read supporters said this law was needed to protect children from accessing firearms to commit suicide. More children are dying from illegal drugs and texting while driving. So do we need a law that requires illegal drugs be locked up and cell phones be locked up while driving a motor vehicle? So the same politicians in New York State who claim to care so much about children dying from guns, support murdering children by abortion. in 2017, NY had 292 total homicides by firearms. Depending on the year you look at the deaths due to vehicle accidents is between 1,100 and 1,200. National analysis assert that 14% of all vehicle deaths are a result of cell phone use by the driver. So you could attribute in NY that between 154 and 168 deaths are a direct result of cell phone use by the driver and that doesn't track those distracted using a cell phone and get hit by a car/driver NOT using a cell phone. Pedestrian on a phone as an example. That is better than half the number so you point would sure be valid if you added in drugs. (even prescription drugs) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rattler Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 The goal of all these gun laws is quite obvious now. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five Seasons Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 On 7/30/2019 at 10:21 PM, ADK Native said: I read supporters said this law was needed to protect children from accessing firearms to commit suicide. More children are dying from illegal drugs and texting while driving. So do we need a law that requires illegal drugs be locked up and cell phones be locked up while driving a motor vehicle? you don't make a good argument. there is a law against driving while texting and a law against drugs. There is not a law against owning a pistol so long as it's permitted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rattler Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 40 minutes ago, Pigmy said: There is not a law against owning a pistol so long as it's permitted. That is a de facto law against owning a pistol. Rights are not privileges that require a permit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapDistPatriot Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steuben Jerry Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Pigmy said: There is not a law against owning a pistol so long as it's permitted I hate that word permitted, a derivative of the word permission. As in "Andy, may I have your permission to own a pistol? Please, King Andy"? 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 I really want a super stacked SCOTUS (With Roberts gone as well) The 2nd Amendment was not intended to be a restriction on the peoples right to arms. It was a clarification restricting the Government. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.