IDRBS Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 From NYS web site S02230 Votes: BILL:S02230 DATE:01/15/2013MOTION: YEA/NAY:104/43 Abbate Y -----Barclay NO Abinant Y -----Blanken NO Arroyo Y ------Borelli NO Aubry Y -------Brindis NO Barrett Y -----Butler NO Barron Y -----Ceretto NO Benedet Y ---Corwin NO Boyland Y ---Crouch NO Braunst Y ---DiPietr NO Brennan Y --Duprey NO Bronson Y --Finch NO Brook K Y ---Friend NO Buchwal Y --Gabrysz NO Cahill Y -----Garbari NO Camara Y --Giglio NO Castro Y ---Goodell NO Clark Y -----Graf NO Colton Y ---Gunther NO Cook Y -----Hawley NO Curran Y ---Johns NO Cusick Y ---Jordan NO Cymbrow Y ----Katz NO DenDekk Y -----Kearns NO Dinowit Y ----Kolb NO Englebr Y -----Lalor NO Espinal Y ---- Lope PD NO Fahy Y --------Lupardo NO Farrell Y -----Magee NO Galef Y ------McLaugh NO Gantt Y ------Montesa NO Gibson Y -----Nojay NO Gjonaj Y -----Oaks NO Glick Y ------Palmesa NO Goldfed Y ------Rabbitt NO Gottfri Y -----Raia NO Heastie Y ---Reilich NO Henness Y ------Saladin NO Hevesi Y ----chimmi NO Hikind Y ------Skoufis NO Hooper Y ----- Stec NO Jacobs Y -----Tedisco NO Jaffee Y -------Tenney NO Kavanag Y ------ Walter NO Kellner Y -------Crespo ER Kim Y -----------Fitzpat ER Lavine Y --------Rivera ER Lentol Y Lifton Y Lope VJ Y Losquad Y Lupinac Y Magnare Y Maisel Y Malliot Y Markey Y Mayer Y McDonal Y McDonou Y McKevit Y Miller Y Millman Y Morelle Y Mosley Y Moya Y Mr Spkr Y Nolan Y O'Donne Y Ortiz Y Otis Y Paulin Y Peoples Y Perry Y Pretlow Y Quart Y Ra Y Ramos Y Roberts Y Robinso Y Rodrigu Y Rosa Y Rosenth Y Rozic Y Russell Y Ryan Y Santaba Y Scarbor Y Schimel Y Sepulve Y Simanow Y Simotas Y Skartad Y Solages Y Steck Y Stevens Y Stirpe Y Sweeney Y Thiele Y Titone Y Titus Y Weinste Y Weisenb Y Weprin Y Wright Y Zebrows Y VOTE: FLOOR VOTE: - Jan 14, 2013 BILL 2388 Ayes (43): Adams, Addabbo, Avella, Boyle, Breslin, Carlucci, Diaz, Dilan, Espaillat, Felder, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Gianaris, Gipson, Golden, Grisanti, Hannon, Hassell-Thomps, Hoylman, Kennedy, Klein, Krueger, Lanza, Latimer, LaValle, Marcellino, Martins, Montgomery, O'Brien, Parker, Peralta, Perkins, Rivera, Sampson, Sanders, Savino, Serrano, Skelos, Smith, Squadron, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousin, Valesky Nays (18): Ball, Bonacic, DeFrancisco, Farley, Gallivan, Griffo, Larkin, Libous, Little, Marchione, Maziarz, Nozzolio, O'Mara, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Robach, Seward, Young Excused (1): Zeldin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 That's the vote from the State Senate. Has anyone seen a similar voting tally from the State Assembly on this bill? I'd like to make up a Word document to file away until next election time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmkay Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 What Republicans voted for it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDRBS Posted January 18, 2013 Author Share Posted January 18, 2013 both Assembly and Senate are listed That's the vote from the State Senate. Has anyone seen a similar voting tally from the State Assembly on this bill? I'd like to make up a Word document to file away until next election time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyantler Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 As much as this stuff is good to know.. I refuse to ever vote for an incumbant... so it won't make much difference in my voting for the future Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sogaard Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 As much as this stuff is good to know.. I refuse to ever vote for an incumbant... so it won't make much difference in my voting for the future I hate career politicians as much as the next guy, but if you really liked what a candidate stood for and the work he did in his previous term, why would you not vote for him again? Especially is the alternative is someone whom you really do not like. I'm just curious... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe12 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I am pleased to say that both my assemblywoman and state senator voted no. I was also please that the recently elected assemblyman from the district right next to us voted no. He is a democrat by the way, so I applaud his courage. By the same token, I hope that you guys that live in conservative districts vote out the republicans that voted yes on this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sogaard Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I gave the list a quick check, I was surprised to see (I believe) every LI Republican voted for the ban. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmkay Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I beleive at least 1 Republican from Buffalo also voted for it. We need to split this state into two states. Everything south of Weschester goes to NYC and everthying else stays NY. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 both Assembly and Senate are listed Then the list is incomplete. My State Assemblyman from the 131st District, Brian Kolb, who voted "no", is not in the list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
landtracdeerhunter Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) Then the list is incomplete. My State Assemblyman from the 131st District, Brian Kolb, who voted "no", is not in the list. Yes he is, 24th down. Jane Corwin, last name is there, first name is different. She voted against because, she didn't have enough time to read the bill and understand it, as she stated in her interview. Wonder how many others didn't even read it.Bet several were quick to jump on the band wagon with Cuomo. Goverment at its worst. Edited January 18, 2013 by landtracdeerhunter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sogaard Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Yes he is, 24th down. Jane Corwin, last name is there, first name is different. She voted against because, she didn't have enough time to read the bill and understand it, as she stated in her interview. Wonder how many others didn't even read it.Bet several were quick to jump on the band wagon with Cuomo. Goverment at its worst. That is a 100% BS excuse used to lay a foundation for defense against attacks for not voting for it from her opponents during her next election, while keeping her Republican voting base happy. It was not a long bill, and she has a staff. If she didn't have enough time to understand a straight forward bill like that with a small army of lawyers at her disposal, she should resign. In my opinion, covering your ass with an excuse like that rather than owning up to your vote is government at its worst. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawnhu Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 (edited) Yes he is, 24th down. Jane Corwin, last name is there, first name is different. She voted against because, she didn't have enough time to read the bill and understand it, as she stated in her interview. Wonder how many others didn't even read it.Bet several were quick to jump on the band wagon with Cuomo. Goverment at its worst. This whole thing reminds of when I was in high school, where peer pressure ran rampant. Do we have a bunch of high schoolers running the show for us? Edited January 19, 2013 by shawnhu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Yes he is, 24th down. Jane Corwin, last name is there, first name is different. She voted against because, she didn't have enough time to read the bill and understand it, as she stated in her interview. Wonder how many others didn't even read it.Bet several were quick to jump on the band wagon with Cuomo. Goverment at its worst. Ok, I got it figured out now....lol. The formatting is actually two columns with only last names. This Dinowit is a different entry than Kolb. Sorry, I was confused. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 That is a 100% BS excuse used to lay a foundation for defense against attacks for not voting for it from her opponents during her next election, while keeping her Republican voting base happy. It was not a long bill, and she has a staff. If she didn't have enough time to understand a straight forward bill like that with a small army of lawyers at her disposal, she should resign. In my opinion, covering your ass with an excuse like that rather than owning up to your vote is government at its worst. The way I am hearing it, they were in such a mad rush to hold the vote and ram this thing through that most of those who were not on the inside creating it, had no chance to even read it, let alone consider the pros and cons of any of the line-items. It sounds like she handled it the honorable way by voting against something she had not had been given time to read. I don't know anything about the lady, but as far as I am concerned anything that is not read thoroughly and carefully considered, should be voted down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveB Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Doc: http://assembly.state.ny.us/mem/Brian-M-Kolb/story/50324/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Ok, I found the Assembly vote. They changed the bill number to S02230 with amendment by Klien. The assembly vote was listed under that that bill number. Thanks all for the help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ford Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 I gave the list a quick check, I was surprised to see (I believe) every LI Republican voted for the ban. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. Not mine, he was "exused" what ever that means... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Nope ..... That's some guy named Dinowit Y Kolb. I have no clue who that is, but he is not my State Assemblyman ... Brian Kolb. If that is a typo, I would like to find a more official site where perhaps I could find something that is more correct. Doesn't anyone have a web-site where I can get this voting info? Like i said, I have found the State Senate voting record on their site. The Senate is not the problem. But the Assembly web-site left off the voting record on that law (at least the last time I checked it). Doc, Dinowit is another assemblymen, and they voted Yes. There are two columns, you are reading them as first name , middle initial, last name. You should read it name, vote, name, vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Doc, Dinowit is another assemblymen, and they voted Yes. There are two columns, you are reading them as first name , middle initial, last name. You should read it name, vote, name, vote. Yeah, the formatting confused me. Got it straight now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fasteddie Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 The "dashes" should help now with the names / votes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.