TeeBugg Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 You can slice it anyway you want...advising headshots is not good advice. But as i said to each his own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Water Rat Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 You owe it to the animal for a quick , ethical humane kill . Not sure if head shots fall into that category. Why not wait it out for a better shot ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 You owe it to the animal for a quick , ethical humane kill . Not sure if head shots fall into that category. Why not wait it out for a better shot ? A head shot, when done correctly, drops them in their tracks. Doesnt get any quicker. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeBugg Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 A head shot, when done correctly, drops them in their tracks. Doesnt get any quicker. This is true. When not done correctly...thats when the crap hits the fan. Wounded animals, broken jaws etc.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 True death occurs when the brain dies. The whole point of any shot is to prevent oxygen flow from reaching the brain. Even a direct heart shot, the brain still lives for a couple of seconds and thus will experience pain even if it's for a very short amount of time. With that said, the brain (especially on a deer) is a small target that is heavily encased in bone thus leaving room for a greater chance of error or deflection. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 This is true. When not done correctly...thats when the crap hits the fan. Wounded animals, broken jaws etc.... I agree. I was just saying. Ill admit to taking a few head shots in the past. I never made a bad head shot, maybe I was lucky, maybe I was just good. Havent taken one in a looooong time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish_redneck Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 A short range headshot with a 223 on a stopped deer should be pretty easy. I can headshot squirrels at 75 yards with mine. Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Water Rat Posted November 8, 2013 Share Posted November 8, 2013 A head shot, when done correctly, drops them in their tracks. Doesnt get any quicker. A spine shot drops them in their tracks too.....wouldn't advocate them either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Posted November 8, 2013 Share Posted November 8, 2013 Spine shot just paralyzes them. Doesn't kill them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ford Posted November 8, 2013 Share Posted November 8, 2013 What's a whitetails brain, inch and a half? No thanks. Had a buddies friend who had a buck run on to a frozen lake after being shot. Well, the ice broke, and the buck went into the drink. I will forgo the details, except to say those headshots aint pretty. He was a good shot but.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 A spine shot drops them in their tracks too.....wouldn't advocate them either. I didnt advocate them. Just stated a fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guns&ReligionCop Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 I'm a big fan of hunting with a 223 but you have to know its limitations. From what you are describing I would go with the 308. 308 has more range and a lot more ummmphhhh. I use my 223 for shots under a 100 yards usually closer to under 50 from the places I sit. You don't exactly have to be a sniper to put one in the goody box from 50 yards! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five Seasons Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 (edited) i think you'll appreciate your scope in low light conditions and when you have targets behind some brush/twigs more than a red dot. Your .308 has an advantage in knock down power and may be more forgiving with a poor shot where a .223 could be less forgiving. I'm only a slug gun hunter so take my comments regarding the calibers with a grain of salt, but I firmly believe in a good scope over a red dot. Edited November 12, 2013 by Belo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five Seasons Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 Maybe you misunderstood me. The AR-15 in .233 the OP has is lighter weight than his Rem 700 in .308, which is his preferred. That right there, is an desirable advantage for the OP. X-Calibur Lighting Systems http://facebook.com/XCaliburLightingSystems what's the weight difference (it cant be that significant)? are we stalking of ground blind/tree stand hunting? I guess less weight would be better when stalking and the red dot would be nicer for quick shots, although i don't condone shooting running deer. But before my grandfather died last spring he continued to hunt with open sights. He preferred the advantage of finding his target quicker. Weight shouldn't factor at all when sitting in the stand. the extra weight can even be welcome for shouldering and steadying the gun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five Seasons Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 Careful, Belo the meat police might see this thread and bite your balls off for such comments. You. Must. Eat. Everything! X-Calibur Lighting Systems http://facebook.com/XCaliburLightingSystems i told you I dont eat the ribs. barely anyone does. Enjoy your head shots and backstrap wasting. you'll never convince me or 95% on this site that only eating the neck and ribs while taking head shots is a good way to hunt. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawnhu Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 what's the weight difference (it cant be that significant)? are we stalking of ground blind/tree stand hunting? I guess less weight would be better when stalking and the red dot would be nicer for quick shots, although i don't condone shooting running deer. But before my grandfather died last spring he continued to hunt with open sights. He preferred the advantage of finding his target quicker. Weight shouldn't factor at all when sitting in the stand. the extra weight can even be welcome for shouldering and steadying the gun. That's a question that should be directed at the OP, he stated the wright difference as a pro. X-Calibur Lighting Systems http://facebook.com/XCaliburLightingSystems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawnhu Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 i told you I dont eat the ribs. barely anyone does. Enjoy your head shots and backstrap wasting. you'll never convince me or 95% on this site that only eating the neck and ribs while taking head shots is a good way to hunt. Not trying to convince anyone to do anything. Just stating what works for me. Maybe you should try it sometime, instead of pushing your agendas. X-Calibur Lighting Systems http://facebook.com/XCaliburLightingSystems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five Seasons Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 (edited) True death occurs when the brain dies. The whole point of any shot is to prevent oxygen flow from reaching the brain. Even a direct heart shot, the brain still lives for a couple of seconds and thus will experience pain even if it's for a very short amount of time. With that said, the brain (especially on a deer) is a small target that is heavily encased in bone thus leaving room for a greater chance of error or deflection. it also prevents deer zombies. Head shots! yippie! Edited November 12, 2013 by Belo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five Seasons Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 Not trying to convince anyone to do anything. Just stating what works for me. Maybe you should try it sometime, instead of pushing your agendas. X-Calibur Lighting Systems http://facebook.com/XCaliburLightingSystems what agenda? is it some product i'm selling on my facebook page? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawnhu Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 what agenda? is it some product i'm selling on my facebook page? Keep derailing the thread Belo. Haven't the Mods already told you to take this to PMs? X-Calibur Lighting Systems http://facebook.com/XCaliburLightingSystems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five Seasons Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 zombie deer Shawn! Zombies! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rotorooter23 Posted November 19, 2013 Share Posted November 19, 2013 Use the .308. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the blur Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Buy a .243. Problem solved. Bang Flop. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanceswithSkunks Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 I would use the Rem 700 in .308. However a 14x40 scope is all but useless unless you're going to watch fields. a 3x9 or 4x12 magnification would be much better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbHunterNY Posted November 27, 2013 Share Posted November 27, 2013 how'd this thread turn onto a zombie deer thread. I think a bunch of you must have A.D.D. go with the 308. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.