Leaderboard

that he might cheat on his wife (s) or has children with a few different woman and might not pay child support or enough of it is no ones business but his and those woman.

Now why is anyone an al or nothing package? I can disagree with many people on one topic and agree with them on other. I can appreciate how some lead their lives and take great dismay in how others do. I thik whether is is picking friends, politicians or showing support for someone that is speaking up on a topic. It doesn't have to be an all or nothing. If there were a political candiate that was a supporter of social programs but also was a stong supported of 2nd ammendment rights. I can agree with their views on one and not the other. when it comes to throwing my support behind that person I have to weigh wich is most important to me. Paula hit it o the head with his family issues. they are his and the women he was involved with (and their childrens) issues. He si speaking up for a topic that many won't take on and is important to me so he, at a minimum, gets my respect for speaking up. Even if I don't like how he sometimes says things. He is at least saying them. The game law violations....well he sucks in that regards and lost his right to speak in those circles until he does some real pennance.

Luck for us the tha 2nd ammendment issue is neither ethics or behavior. it is a right.

Be careful what button you click onto . You might get Tele-ported to another planet !

I find the idea that anyone who speaks on something should be perfect to be completely silly and unrealistic. Everyone makes mistakes, and most of us make alot of them. Maybe you should step out of your glass house before you start throwing stones my friend.

$10 says there are those on this forum that would whole heartedly disagree with that.... Sorry, I couldnt resist

So my wife and I are New Parents and this will be her first mothers day. As part of her gift on sunday she wants me to not talk about hunting or guns for 24 hours!!! When I'm sleeping its easy but while I'm awake,, yikes idk if i I can do that. It's way to hard and I will get a headache trying not to talk about both but thinking about it. Oh well it's only one day.....

\Doc, I take back saying you are wrong. That is a bold statement to say on a thread. I enjoy everyone on this site, we just have some strong opinions. May I say I disagree with you.

The bottom line Doc is that he does more harm than good. So what good is he? He hasn't gained any thing meaningful for us. If you believe he has I would like to hear about it. He is articulate enough and quick thinking enough to put an anti in their place from time to time. That isn't enough, especially so with his baggage and his tendency to take one step forward and two steps back by his ill conceived and some times illegal actions.He needs to have the respect of us and the general public. He doesn't have our unified respect (my guess is maybe 50%) and I guarantee that he is no where close to having the respect of the majority of the general public. The hunting boards are loaded now with discussions about Ted. I am actually pleased that the majority of the comments are not in favor of him. Go on the community forum on BOWSITE, and 24 Hour Campfire. Finally people are waking up to how negative a force he is for us.

Why is it that almost every single one of your posts is nothing but a promo for your blog? Maybe you should partner up with the site as a sponsor?

Hold on just a second, you said that Nugent is a "self appointed leader in the area of gun rights and our hunting heritage" right? What exactly does that mean? Hes not a leader of anything but a rock and roll band. Hes not my spokesman, nor yours, he speaks for HIMSELF. Thats it. If you dont agree with his message, then attack that. His personal life is none of your business, and none of mine. Hes not any kind of god except maybe in his own mind. Hes just another HUMAN, like you and me. Why would you EVER think that he would be or should be perfect? Why does everything have to be PC or sanitized to be a valid thought or idea? Why are you so hell bent on personally attacking someone rather than address the message they are trying to convey?

I'd rather Nugent not say anything at all. His past and his present reveal the very questionable character he really is. By his actions and his motor mouth he gives sportsman, particularly hunters and gun owners a big black eye. Nugent isn't promoting gun rights, Nugent is promoting Nugent. Listening to Nugent on Ethics and Behavior would be like going to a sex therapy seminar given by Nuns.

I have killed 2 deer whith 6mm's 1 was 150yd shot with a rem 6mmbr in a xp100 and a 80gr single shot pistol bullet the other was with my 700 rem at about 70yds useing 100gr btsp. Both bullets went though and they did a lot of damage on the way. 1 deer went about 50yds the other went about 5ft. you have to use the right bullet and put it where it needs to go

Simple. Sleep all day.

Called this one in yestarday at 11:55 am..

The interview has been edited. At the 19 second mark and the 23 second mark, the continuity is broken. What was said by CBS at these two points that was edited out? Sounds like they are playing a tape that has been doctored to make Ted look like he is exploding for no reason. I trust CBS about as far as I can throw a baby grand. Nobody has a right to pass judgement on Ted. That's for God to decide in the end. Judge not, and you will not be judged.

My bad...mis spoke. i was thinking 243. I have 100 rounds loaded. let me know when you can get out You can be my test dummy for the rounds with the magnum primers...lol

Well, as long as it was legal, theres no real problem. Ethics are a personal matter, and anyones ethics besides that hunter's dont really matter in this case. Just my opinion.