Woodjr55 Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 Why is it that you can use a rifle for predators in non rifle areas for deer? Last winter I was going coyote hunting in Clarence called the dec and they said that I could use my .243. I never asked why you couldn't for deer though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josephmrtn Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 politics 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
First-light Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 A lot less predator hunters out there, less of a safety issue is my take. Then again it only takes 1 time 1 bullet to cause an accident. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BizCT Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 Yea, its a weird law. That's how it is here in Putnam County too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
landtracdeerhunter Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 The way Clarance is building up, I would think twice about using rifle for anything. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 Its a dumb law. Pointless as well. Safe gun handling is safe gun handling, doesnt matter what type it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 I have to admit, as a landowner, I definitely had second thoughts about rifles in Ontario County. I didn't come out on the side of rifles for deer hunting very easily. I think there is enough info on the pro-rifle side to at least allow a trial period. I have to agree that those that will hunt irresponsibly will do so regardless of what kind of weapon they have in their hands. The only question is whether that irresponsibility can have its effects extended in distance because of rifles. There is also a question as to whether rifles will be promoting much longer shots where visibility into the background gets limited by distance. I don't have any answers or even predictions on those concerns so,I am enthusiastically on the side of the rifles and say that we have to wait and see. I will say this, if there is even one incident, especially one that injures or kills a non-hunter. We are likely to see a very fast reversal on this law But that isn't what you asked. I think the real question is how did rifles get allowed for varmints but not deer. I am not even sure that the rifles-for-varmints law is a legislatively controlled ruling. Chances are pretty good that when the varmint hunting laws were first conceived, it was just automatically assumed that hunters would have to use rifles in order to be effective. So why is the fate of rifles for deer hunting legislatively controlled. The more I find out about conservation law, the more inconsistencies I see. But here's some random thoughts: Deer hunting is done with a very dense hunter population as compared to varmint hunting. That means that deer hunting is a highly visible activity and gets a whole lot more attention. Deer hunters have been villainized by the public mostly because of actions of some hunters and because of public imagination. So they're not too interested in promoting longer shots. People automatically assume deer rifles are some kind of mega-powered weapon that fires bullets that can't be stopped. People feel that shotguns are 50 yard weapons and that a slug simply falls to the ground so they are very safe. When it comes to rifles for varmints, people really don't even think about that, and are not even aware of the activity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pewlodar Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 It is just political foolishness. Last time I check, you can use a rifle anywhere you want in PA for deer. Now I know is it south of NY and they do crazy things down in the south but i beleive they have suburbs and hunting is allowed "close" to homes. havent heard but do that have a higher number of "accident"? Just be smart and safe with whatever weapon you chose, and enjoy your hunt while you let me enjoy mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two Track Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 Ever try sneaking up to blast a groundhog with a shotgun? Bet they move away or crawl down a hole before you get in range with the shotgun. Much easier to take them with a rifle from 50 yards +. They tend to be ground shots and not shots parallel to the ground, like deer hunting, which increases the safety. Similar deal to take care of coyotes going for the chickens, ducks, or other small farm animals. Taking long shots at coyotes and groundhog would otherwise mean using a slug gun, like a H&R 20ga magnum rifled heavy barrel with scope set for 100 yards. The cost using of those sabot rounds on them will eat away at funding your deer/bear season (assuming you have a ground hog/coyote problem on your property). I just don't get using a rifle on squirrels, especially when they are sitting on a tree limb. Where does that 22 or .17 round drop? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 if anyone deer hunted Sate Land in the Catskills back during when there was a hunter behind every tree, can tell you that the odds of being hit with a rifle slug are pretty slim.......... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.