Jump to content

Seven bullet ruling still illegal in most of NY


Recommended Posts

I just read an article on Syracuse.com from the Onondaga county DA about the recent ruling about the 7 bullet limit in a gun. He says that since this was ruled in a court in western NY that these changes only apply to these areas, that include Buffalo and Rochester. Any other areas of NY state it is still illegal to have a gun loaded with more than 7 bullets. How does it only affect a certain area if a state court has ruled on a state law?? anybody know how this can work like this?? I will try to see if I can post the article on here.

Edited by boo711
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Safe Act bullet ruling only in effect for Western New York, DA Fitzpatrick says

 

Syracuse, N.Y. - A federal judge's ruling this week striking down New York's seven-bullet maximum does not change the current law statewide, according to Onondaga County District Attorney William Fitzpatrick.

 

On Tuesday, federal Judge William Skretny in Buffalo struck down a provision of the NY Safe Act restricting gun owners from loading more than seven bullets in 10-round magazines.

 

That ruling, however, only covers the Western District of New York - an area that includes Buffalo and Rochester but not Syracuse. That means the ruling is not binding in the rest of the state, Fitzpatrick said.

 

That could change if the state appeals the decision and the 2nd Circuit Court rules on the matter. But that could be months away, Fitzpatrick added.

 

Attorney General Eric Schneiderman will decide whether New York appeals the bullet ruling; his office had no comment today on whether he will appeal.

 

Until then, Fitzpatrick's advice for those outside of Western New York is to abide by the Safe Act as written and adhere to the seven-bullet limit.

 

"My advice would be to continue to follow the law as written unless you want to get involved in a lengthy challenge," he said.

Contact Teri Weaver at [email protected], 315-470-2274 or on Twitter at @TeriKWeaver.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From an attorney involved in the lawsuits .

Technically a district court opinion would only apply in that district but rarely does one district within the same state (even though these are federal districts) not follow the decision of another. It does happen however. While his claim is technically correct in law, it is very sad and unfortunate that some will kick and scream against this law going down when it only hurts those seeking legitimate self defense. Criminals are laughing at all of this.

Only a decision from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals would apply to all districts in the circuit.

In my view, the ten rounds is dead, but we don't have a statewide ruling on that yet. Fitzpatrick is just being overly aggressive. But he will not be the one that votes on whether to convict. I don't see any jury convicting anyone of seven round use.

Edited by Larry302
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did, however, say that the 7-round law placed law abiding citizens at a disadvantage against criminals with 10 rounds.  That speaks volumes.....Now let's hope someone exploits that comment for our good in getting the rest of this bogus law squashed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did, however, say that the 7-round law placed law abiding citizens at a disadvantage against criminals with 10 rounds.  That speaks volumes.....Now let's hope someone exploits that comment for our good in getting the rest of this bogus law squashed.

I would have thought more of the statement if he had said. 7 against 15 or 30 since being a criminal they probably aren't following the 10 round rule anyway...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

only way it will get squashed is to get rid of the idiots who put it in place.  He said that we do not have the same constitutional rights under the 2nd amendment other states have by saying it is ok ot ban guns here but not other places.  That may be a fighting point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   I know this is off subject here but me also being computer illiterate & don't copy/paste things maybe someone could help find & post it. A friend sent me a list of U.S. Senators  46 out of 100 that voted to give our rights away to the "U.N. Arms Trade Treaty" Which would require a world wide gun register & screw with our 2nd. Amend.      Thanks for any help, & sorry to get off subject but I feel this would be of interest to people here. These senators need to be voted OUT of office.   We must not forget these people when voteing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole thing kills me….the judge ruled that telling a person that he/she can load a magazine with only 7 rounds was "arbitrary". But telling a person what stock he/she can put on their long gun isn't "arbitrary". Now we have DA's  who are interpreting the decision differently? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...