Jump to content

DON'T COMPLY! YOU'LL HAVE PLENTY OF COMPANY.


Recommended Posts

You may have heard on the news about a Southern California man who was put under 72-hour psychiatric observation when it was found he owned 100 guns and allegedly had 100,000 rounds of ammunition stored in his home. The house also featured a secret escape tunnel.  

 

By Southern California standards, someone owning 100,000 rounds is considered "mentally unstable."  

 

In Michigan , he'd be called "The last white guy still living in Detroit ."  

 

In Arizona , he'd be called "an avid gun collector."  

 

In Arkansas , he'd be called "a novice gun collector."  

 

In Utah , he'd be called "moderately well prepared," but they'd probably reserve judgment until they made sure that he had a corresponding quantity of stored food."  

 

In Kansas , he'd be "A guy down the road you would want to have for a friend."  

 

In Montana , he'd be called "The neighborhood 'Go-To' guy."  

 

In Alabama , he'd be called "a likely gubernatorial candidate."  

 

In Georgia , he'd be called "an eligible bachelor."  

 

In North Carolina , Virginia , Mississippi , Tennessee , Kentucky and South Carolina he would be called "a deer hunting buddy."  

 

And in Texas he'd just be "Bubba, who's a little short on ammo."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Abbey,

I did my taxes today, and also filled out the registration forms for all of my guns. None of my guns are actually illegal but I figured I might as well get a jump on it since I was doing silly paperwork anyway.

Problem is I found it necessary to drink a couple of beers during this exercise in nonsense, and I think the IRS might be getting my firearms registration forms, and I have no idea where my tax forms will end up. I'm thinking they'll all get it sorted out amongst themselves due to inter-agency communication and all.

Should I be worried?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's a personal choice if you wanna risk it but you should be well aware of the reprecussions

 

in todays paper.

 

ALBANY, N.Y. —  ........If a gun owner is found to have knowingly violated the registration requirement, they could face either a misdemeanor for failing to register or a felony for illegal possession of an assault weapon.

I keep seeing this word "knowingly" used in a lot of these articles and quotes. How is that determined? Do they have some mind reader specialist that determines if you knew you were breaking the law? Whatever happened to that old goofy saying, "Ignorance of the law is no excuse"? I would think that if that word "knowingly"is in the law, I would be simply saying, "Damn, I didn't know it had to be registered".    Somehow I doubt that really would work.....lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep seeing this word "knowingly" used in a lot of these articles and quotes. How is that determined? Do they have some mind reader specialist that determines if you knew you were breaking the law? Whatever happened to that old goofy saying, "Ignorance of the law is no excuse"? I would think that if that word "knowingly"is in the law, I would be simply saying, "Damn, I didn't know it had to be registered".    Somehow I doubt that really would work.....lol.

I am thinking posts and emails may hurt a persons cause.

 

I heard an interview on the way in this morning with some lady from NYAGV and she certainly had her talking points down. I would really love to have an hour with her to actually have a conversation with firearms displayed and discuss the points she kept hanging her hat on. They fly in the face of logic and make no sense when you understand the function of the firearms. I know logic in this argument is an oxymoron but unfortunately people listen.

 

she was justifying registration in NY of "assault weapons" and cited the registering of pistols as justification and a demonstration of how it will reduce the AW use in crime. I don't understand that. Her argument actually proves the opposite since the pistol is the most used firearm in crime in NY and is the most highly regulated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is extremely frustrating to listen to these anti gun proponents drone on and on with their nonsensical, incorrect  "facts". They are never challenged on them. 

I often think back of a "fact filled" interview that, Dianne Finestien gave to Bob Schieffer, concerning gun violence. It was sickening. She just went on and on with her made up gun statistics , and the interviewer never said boo to her. He never challenged her on a single point.  Sickening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure about the "knowingly" however ignorance is no excuse as they say

Fyi for those that have unregistered firearms that fall under this law I would avoid mentioning what you have online... you do know your IP address points to your house. No need to express what a firearm aficionado you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

doubt you want to be assembling as an intruder is entering

 

you mentioned zombie apocalypse, not home defense. I'd rather have a short barrel shotty or handgun than a carbine inside my home. Now If I know that the koreans have attacked, the zombie virus is spreading or martial law is going in to place. I have a few minutes to get my AR ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Society like to label things as too dangerous take for instance pit bulls they arent any more dangerous than a shepard or a rottie however when they do attack the are effective. Some may say overly effective.

Take for instance black talon bullets, outlawed why? Too effective? Last time I checked bullets were designed to kill. Unless your shooting at paper but I dont belive they were designed for paper

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Society like to label things as too dangerous take for instance pit bulls they arent any more dangerous than a shepard or a rottie however when they do attack the are effective. Some may say overly effective.

Take for instance black talon bullets, outlawed why? Too effective? Last time I checked bullets were designed to kill. Unless your shooting at paper but I dont belive they were designed for paper

The big difference being the comparison of an inanimate object vs one with will

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...