MrGroundhog Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Is anyone familiar with their stocks? From what I have researched they seem to be a very nice replacement for the money. I am looking at replacing my crappy savage stock on my 220 slug gun for the prairie hunter stock. I would like to have that higher cheek weld and obviously the nicer look. The gun is already a tack driver, and I'm assuming the accuracy would be better. Has anyone heard of accuracy getting worse after changing out a stock? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loworange88 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I bought a stock set from them for my old Savage 24. Very nice set for the money. The overall finish was very high quality, I had to do a small bit of fitting to make the butt fit my receiver, but other than that, its great. A guy here at work bought a stock for his bolt action deer gun, and he said it dropped right on, no fitting required, and he loves it. I'd say it would be a good upgrade should you decide to buy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moog5050 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Didn't think anyone made a stock for the 220. Good to know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrGroundhog Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 Yeah I think that it is relatively new. I am just worried about the accuarcy. I have bullets touching at a 100 yards with this gun. As the old saying goes if it isn't broke don't fix it. I would just really like to get that monte Carlo type stock as the scope sits high. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moog5050 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Just checked it out. I love thumbhole stocks and for $99, I will likely give one a try. Thanks for the info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneam2006 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Damn 99 bucks I'm a look into them now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Yeah I think that it is relatively new. I am just worried about the accuarcy. I have bullets touching at a 100 yards with this gun. As the old saying goes if it isn't broke don't fix it. I would just really like to get that monte Carlo type stock as the scope sits high. A lot of accuracy is in the fit between the stock & the action. No replacement stock will have a presice fit & Boyds stocks, while decent, are still what you would call a utility grade stock. An aftermarket stock with precise fit would be expensive. I doubt if you will improve the results you cite above. You may or may not see a degradation. (if it ain't broke you can't fix it) If you are experienced at inletting, you have a good shot at duplicating the above results with a stock that will fit your pysical characteristics better.. I would think that a slug gun would have a higher comb than a wingshooting shotgun. My 1st choice would be to mount the scope as low as possible. Is that the case right now? If the scope is as low as possible, a lace on leather cheek piece would raise yur cheek weld. I used one on an 870 Express that had a 1-4X20 Leupy mounted on it. Just some options that you might consider. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrGroundhog Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 I have thought about lowering the scope, but that is not an option due to ejection reasons. I have watched videos on bedding a stock, that doesn't seem to difficult. I may just try this and hope the accuracy remains the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I have thought about lowering the scope, but that is not an option due to ejection reasons. I have watched videos on bedding a stock, that doesn't seem to difficult. I may just try this and hope the accuracy remains the same. Take your time and baby steps. It isn't that difficult. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rotorooter23 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Loved my boyds, even though it says $99 dollars they did charge me $50 dollars for shipping. Well worth it all in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pygmy Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I'm thinking about getting one for my Garand. The previous owner did an amateur job of refinishing it, and it's got a few dings in it that look like burn marks.. It shoots fine, but the stock looks like crap A buddy of mine got a Boyd's stock for his M1 and it's a very nice walnut stock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thphm Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 If a new stock is not inletted exactly for your firearm it can make it shoot worst then it does now.as the receiver too tight in one spot and too loose in another, the barrel channel too tight . Glass bedding and or pillar bedding is time consuming to do it right ( there are many vid's ) on how to do it. The cost of a pro doing it can run anywhere from $100.00 to $ 300.00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrGroundhog Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 I believe the stock is inleted as described on their site for that particular model. Are you saying it differs from each firearm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moog5050 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Its inletted for that model, I think the concern is that if its not sufficiently precise some minor modifications (trimming) may be required. Yes, they are all specific to a certain model. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cptjack Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 got a stock for my 700 short action a lot thicker around the hand trigger area on the pistol grip compared to rem wood factory, 70 win and ruger mark II For me the ruger is the most comfortable to shoot fits me best Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I have thought about lowering the scope, but that is not an option due to ejection reasons. I have watched videos on bedding a stock, that doesn't seem to difficult. I may just try this and hope the accuracy remains the same. Use some inletting black on the action & only remove wood where the black indicates a high spot. when you get black across a broad area, you have it. You can use smke from a candle to blacken the action. Relieved the wood behind the rear tang a little to prevent splitting. You can always go back to the old stock with a leather cheekpiece if the accuracy suffers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I believe the stock is inleted as described on their site for that particular model. Are you saying it differs from each firearm? Its inletted for that model, I think the concern is that if its not sufficiently precise some minor modifications (trimming) may be required. Yes, they are all specific to a certain model. They usually leave some wood for trimming. That allows a more precise fit in the end. Not a big deal, just expect to spend an evening or maybe even 2 getting that fit. Take your time & you will get better results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrGroundhog Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 I guess I'll give it a whirl.. I'm not too familiar with the terminology but I'll watch some more videos and hopefully it's a decent match. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phade Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 A boyd's thumbhole is on the list for my 243 this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrGroundhog Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 I'm torn between the thumbhole and prairie. I love the feel of the thumbhole. But wonder if it would be tough to handle and work the bolt quickly if needed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phade Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I'm torn between the thumbhole and prairie. I love the feel of the thumbhole. But wonder if it would be tough to handle and work the bolt quickly if needed. The right answer is "Who needs to work the bolt? The deer is dead." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pygmy Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 Let me borrow a quote from General George Patton. He was describing pearl grips on a handgun... " Only a pimp in a New Orleans whorehouse would use a thumbhole stock "... hehehehe..No offense, but I like thumbhole stocks ALMOST as much as I like TC Contenders/Encores... YEW- GLEE !!!....<<grin>>.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moog5050 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 Pygmy You will live my collection. I have both. Lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pygmy Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cptjack Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 as far was the boyds stock for the 700 bdl the machining for the trigger guard and floor plate assembly was about a 1/16 inch too large ,not acceptable in my book Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.