2.5 or 3.5..?

[wooly]

Not that it makes a big difference since my minds already made up if I get an opportunity.

Just curious what you all think because to me it looks like he could go either way, but I'm leaning towards 2.5.

[turkeyfeathers]

I suck at aging. But, even your trail cam pics are woolyesque !!  He's very nice whatever age he may be.

[wooly]

6 minutes ago, turkeyfeathers said:

I suck at aging. But, even your trail cam pics are woolyesque !!  He's very nice whatever age he may be.

Thanks- I try my best to "compose" the shot before anything steps into it.

Missed some pretty shots due to no daylight action a couple weeks ago with the turning leaves. Everything happened at night instead.

[ATbuckhunter]

I want to say 3.5 because of his very defined muscles and what looks like mature skeletal structure. 

[jim335]

I also am not good at this, but I look at how thick the base of the horns are, and his looks to be on the thinner side, so I'm leaning to 2.5.  Don't know if this is right or wrong, just my guess.  Definitely a nice deer!

[moog5050]

Good 2 year old IMO.  Neck smooth to chest and not square yet.  Good looking buck.  

[First-light]

2.5

[Chef]

2.5 chest and stomach are not there yet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Pygmy]

He'll be a dandy next year....<<grin>>.....

[ny hunter]

I want to say 2,5 but that third pic he looks more hefty in the and chest...Put an arrow in him so you can have a tooth checked.....Good luck...

[LET EM GROW]

IMO going with a dandy 2.5 yr old. 

[QDM4ME]

Couldn't ask for a better picture to age.
Looks like a real nice 2.5 good luck with him if you decide to go after em'.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk