BizCT Posted April 1, 2017 Author Share Posted April 1, 2017 So, I say again, who cares about P-Y or B&C? You wanna be famous? Just post on the web. P&Y and B&C do a ton of fighting for our rights though. As does SCI and other groups. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtTime Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 11 minutes ago, Biz-R-OWorld said: P&Y and B&C do a ton of fighting for our rights though. As does SCI and other groups. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I agree. They even say every once in a while, every deer you kill is a trophy to you. Biz, I am not trying to argue with you. I just think there should be more to hunting then killing the biggest rack deer. Those record books mean nothing to me. Nor does the "score" of a buck. I hunt because I love hunting, I love eating venison, and just being out there in the woods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BizCT Posted April 1, 2017 Author Share Posted April 1, 2017 I agree. They even say every once in a while, every deer you kill is a trophy to you. Biz, I am not trying to argue with you. I just think there should be more to hunting then killing the biggest rack deer. Those record books mean nothing to me. Nor does the "score" of a buck. I hunt because I love hunting, I love eating venison, and just being out there in the woods. I'm not saying there's a right or wrong reason to hunt. My only comment was a fact: a record book animal is not a record book animal unless it's actually in the record book. Again, I don't care what other people do. I was just stating a fact. I have 0 P&Y and 0 B&C so it's not relevant to me. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtTime Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 11 minutes ago, Biz-R-OWorld said: I'm not saying there's a right or wrong reason to hunt. My only comment was a fact: a record book animal is not a record book animal unless it's actually in the record book. Again, I don't care what other people do. I was just stating a fact. I have 0 P&Y and 0 B&C so it's not relevant to me. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Again I agree. Quote My only comment was a fact: a record book animal is not a record book animal unless it's actually in the record book. That is a fact. I guess I was trying to make a moot point about hunting just to get in the books. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 (edited) Do some see hunting as a competition between hunters. That is something that I guess I never experienced, since my competition is more with the deer that I hunt than with any other hunters. I never was driven to advertise my achievements in some book. And so, I never paid a lot of attention to any systems of scoring or trying to beat out other hunters by getting some line item in a record book. I am not hunting to impress anyone but myself. My hunting successes and achievements are my own to enjoy, and I do not need the approval of some organization or some conjured up scoring system to tell me if I should be happy with my successes. But, I guess we are all in the activity for different reasons and with different personal needs. So I see it all as kind of a harmless endeavor as long as it doesn't create pressures on hunting that drive laws and restrictions and begins to drive participants from hunting. So, does it? I guess that is a subject for a different topic. Edited April 1, 2017 by Doc 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckmaster7600 Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 Instagram. Even Eva Shockey has 1/2 million followers. Once you have enough followers you get paid to just post ads of itemsSent from my iPhone using TapatalkDon't know what an Instagram is but if Eva Shockey is going I will follow her!Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adkhunter1590 Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 Don't know what an Instagram is but if Eva Shockey is going I will follow her!Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkShe's on FB too. I don't have instagram. No idea what it even is. FB is all I do. I draw the line on social media there lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckmaster7600 Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 She's on FB too. I don't have instagram. No idea what it even is. FB is all I do. I draw the line on social media there lol. I'm assuming you're talking about Facebook but I don't do that either. With that butt Eva has there ain't many places I wouldn't follow her!Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adkhunter1590 Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 I'm assuming you're talking about Facebook but I don't do that either. With that butt Eva has there ain't many places I wouldn't follow her!Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkI hear ya! I like seeing her pics. Beautiful gal that's for sure! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BizCT Posted April 1, 2017 Author Share Posted April 1, 2017 You guys are nuts. I think Eva is a 6/10 at best. Nothing special and a weird nose.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fasteddie Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 How can Pope and Young ban Trail Cams ? They are both dead ! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomad Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 6 hours ago, Biz-R-OWorld said: You guys are nuts. I think Eva is a 6/10 at best. Nothing special and a weird nose. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk She's no Liberte Austin . 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Real_TCIII Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 You take a 6, add a camo baseball hat and you have a 9.5. The science is irrefutable. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
growalot Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 I doubt any of you would put a bag over her head before......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
growalot Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 Ooopppsss did I just say that out loud... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BizCT Posted April 1, 2017 Author Share Posted April 1, 2017 I doubt any of you would put a bag over her head before.........I would pass on herSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
growalot Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 For your wife's sake I'd hope so! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five Seasons Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 So cell cam for inventory is OK but for "locating, pursuing or guiding the hunter" its not OK. This looks like a great new specialty area for a lawyer. lol A cell cam used to locate gets close to the drone idea of locating deer. Not exactly the same but depending on how many cams you're using I can see how it's viewed as unsporting. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fasteddie Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 5 hours ago, Biz-R-OWorld said: I would pass on her Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Is the rack too small for you ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeGuy Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 Sad to see her go, but love to watch her leave. I'd be ok with big Jim as my FIL, or my mistresses dadBiz, seriously!?! You rate her a six, but in the words of Fred bear if you rate your women by numbers, oh wait, what was it!??? Whatever. Guess numbers is the topic of the post, so I get it. What exactly are you measuring to get a 6 though? Inches between the rack ? I So your saying she's equal to a yearling with two 3" spikes ? I'm lost.... And headed way off track. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BizCT Posted April 2, 2017 Author Share Posted April 2, 2017 Is the rack too small for you ? Face isn't great Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BizCT Posted April 2, 2017 Author Share Posted April 2, 2017 Sad to see her go, but love to watch her leave. I'd be ok with big Jim as my FIL, or my mistresses dadBiz, seriously!?! You rate her a six, but in the words of Fred bear if you rate your women by numbers, oh wait, what was it!??? Whatever. Guess numbers is the topic of the post, so I get it. What exactly are you measuring to get a 6 though? Inches between the rack ? I So your saying she's equal to a yearling with two 3" spikes ? I'm lost.... And headed way off track. Sent from my XT1585 using TapatalkHer face doesn't do it for me.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadKill44 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 P&Y, B&C, F&S and others can be called antler porn by some. Playboy and the SI swimsuit issues could be called porn in a different venue. All can be a good read but the reality of what you take home and enjoy the most has nothing to do with size. I do have a nice evenly balanced ten point on the wall but, in spite of the pride I have in taking it, looking at it reminds me of the four hour endeavor and excitement to harvest this guy. It took me awhile to realize that even my closest friends only see a ten point. One can win while hunting regardless of the final score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.