How old and what would he score

[Nyhunter1992]

How old and what would he score

[Nyhunter1992]

And how old do you think this one is?

[ny hunter]

Love the brow tones... hard to tell age from the pics

[Gencountyzeek]

3.5 is a guess and id say 108"ish.

[NFA-ADK]

2 - 3 good buck high 90's.  Pics are hard to judge the body for age.  A good 2.5 or a below average 3.5, good food in the area I would say 2 bad food then 3. 

[njg0621]

On 10/24/2018 at 12:01 PM, NFA-ADK said:

2 - 3 good buck high 90's.  Pics are hard to judge the body for age.  A good 2.5 or a below average 3.5, good food in the area I would say 2 bad food then 3. 

 

The buck in the first pic is over 100"

[NFA-ADK]

Stupid me, thought they where the same buck.  When the antlers go past the ears I say over 2 but the first buck is not so I think both are 2 year olds.  Would be easier with better pics.  Food and genetics make a big difference also time of birth.  Top one could be a 3  year old but he does not look it to me.  Possibly a better side pic would help to see if his body look like a 3.5.  Second one is no older than 2.5. 

[Dom]

no good at aging but if I had to shhot one be the top one.both good deer

[cbyzerman]

That first buck is probably only 2.5.....   i know alot of people don't want to hear it but I would let that buck grow.......  Might be real nice next year.........

[BowmanMike]

On 10/25/2018 at 3:20 PM, NFA-ADK said:

Stupid me, thought they where the same buck.  When the antlers go past the ears I say over 2 but the first buck is not so I think both are 2 year olds.  Would be easier with better pics.  Food and genetics make a big difference also time of birth.  Top one could be a 3  year old but he does not look it to me.  Possibly a better side pic would help to see if his body look like a 3.5.  Second one is no older than 2.5. 

I agree with this. Good looking rack,but not much mass.

[G-Man]

well at my place they would both be 2.5 year olds