CharlieNY Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 I live in Cayuga County, New York, where centerfire rifles became legal for deer for the first time this season beginning on Nov. 17. This morning I got a 75 yd. shot at a big mature doe. I was using my Remington Model 700 in .243 Winchester. I put the shot right behind the shoulder and she flinched, walked 10 yds. and dropped dead. I hd some reservations about using this gun as some other hunters told me it was "kind of light for deer." I was using 95 gr. Hornady SST Superformance factory rounds. I love this gun as it has very light recoil compared to the shotgun slugs I was used to using in the past. I will be carrying this gun for deer hunting from now on during the firearms season. I have no reservations about it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuntOrBeHunted Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 I want a 243. Win bad.. So bad that i'm going to put on on layway at gander mountain for next gun season. Nice wood stock with a nikon or leupold scope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuntOrBeHunted Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 I live in Cayuga County, New York, where centerfire rifles became legal for deer for the first time this season beginning on Nov. 17. This morning I got a 75 yd. shot at a big mature doe. I was using my Remington Model 700 in .243 Winchester. I put the shot right behind the shoulder and she flinched, walked 10 yds. and dropped dead. I hd some reservations about using this gun as some other hunters told me it was "kind of light for deer." I was using 95 gr. Hornady SST Superformance factory rounds. I love this gun as it has very light recoil compared to the shotgun slugs I was used to using in the past. I will be carrying this gun for deer hunting from now on during the firearms season. I have no reservations about it now. Nice job man. My opinion is that a 243. caliber weapon is not to small at all for a deer gun. I've heard people asking and talking about using much smaller caliber weapons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the blur Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 I have a 7mm-08 semi auto, and a .243 bolt. The 7mm-08 certainly kicks much harder than the .243, even with the gas action. I don't hunt with my .243, but I hear more bang-flop stories with the .243 than any other caliper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeGuy Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 I have a 700 6mm rem. Passed down from gramps. We both have taken a pile of deer with it. I have never had to track more than 50yrds. The big buck i got last year was a pass through the shoulders. Definately enough "knock down", definately enough to kill, definately not the biggest rifle out there. The rifle is a tack driver, i feel confidence in a shot over caliber size is the way to go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guns&ReligionCop Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 243 is fine for deer. The swedes have been using a round comparable to the 260 to shoot moose for years and years. I've shot plenty of deer with a 223 and never had a problem and thats even smaller. I punched a doe in the chest with my 270 that ran almost a 100 yards even though its heart and lungs looked like a grenade went off. I have had the 270 drop other deer with the same shot on the spot. If you have the mentality that bigger is better use a 50 cal BMG that will stop'em 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawdwaz Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 I killed another one with the 243 yesterday in PA. 80gr Barnes TTSX, 3400fps. 215 yard shot. He was probably 150lbs dressed. The 243 is just dandy for deer. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Setters4life Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 I killed another one with the 243 yesterday in PA. 80gr Barnes TTSX, 3400fps. 215 yard shot. He was probably 150lbs dressed. The 243 is just dandy for deer. I have been thinking of trying the lighter bullets in my 6mm for deer-size game. How do you like the 80 gr. Barnes in your .243? Do you get complete penetration with that bullet? Just curious. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawdwaz Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 I have been thinking of trying the lighter bullets in my 6mm for deer-size game. How do you like the 80 gr. Barnes in your .243? Do you get complete penetration with that bullet? Just curious. Thanks The one on Monday in PA. was in & out and now resides in the Tioga County turf. The one in the link bellow is in my hand as the post notes. Stem to stern, probably 40" on drilling before it ran out of gas............<grin> I'd say that the 80gr Barnes works for me and will probably work for you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Setters4life Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 That's impressive. Thanks for the feedback. I may try the 80 gr. in my .257 as well. (Hmm, that means more load development.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 I was at the local gun shop yesterday looking at rifles. I had a savage axis in 243 in my hands. Loved the feel even though the trigger pull is a little heavy, but workable. I ordered one in 7-08. I wish I had just grabbed the 243. Would have been fun getting reloading stuff for a new caliber. Maybe I will get the 243 if I really like the 7-08 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad 6424 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Shot placement is all it is I have hunted with most of the calibers in this post the remington 243 I use a hornady 100gr vmax the 7m08 same hornady my 270 , 308 and 3006 I use belive it or not I use 145 to 165gr remington corelock these rounds have never let me down I know there are alot of folks that love them BUT my least favorite one is my remington 308 seems as every time I have shot a deer with it they run weather its 50foot or 5miles they have ran just an old rednecks point of vue lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noahmstone Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 My father gave me his .243 when he stopped hunting. He has taken a quite a few deer with it. He told me that there was only 1 time he took more than one shot with that gun at a deer. He said he shot once and it just stood there so he thought he missed an shot at it again it stood there for a couple seconds and dropped. He recovered both round from the heart. I haven't shot as many with it but the three I have shot didn't travel more than 5-10 yards. I found the same model as my .243 a couple years ago in 30-06 I bought it. The 30-06 sits in the safe because I know what the .243 will do and I have confidence in it. I have thought about trading in the 30-06 for a newer upgraded .243 but I have also thought about trying the 7mm-08. But my fathers .243 will never go anywhere. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jusputtn Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 I haven't taken the time to read all of this lengthy thread so please forgive if I'm being repititous. A 243, 223 357,etc. will take deer just fine. IMO, the issue here is the fallacies that have somehow transgressed into "fact ". 1-a bad shot is a bad shot no matter what cartridge is used. 2-there is no requirement for a bullet to pass through to be effective 3-having a deer run a bit in the few seconds it takes to die is the norm 4-I have no desire to shoot a deer at a poor angle as I don't want to waste any meat or be reasonable for a slow agonizing death . Be ethical and you will have a short follow up. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jusputtn Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Oops, make that responsible in item 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 I was at the local gun shop yesterday looking at rifles. I had a savage axis in 243 in my hands. Loved the feel even though the trigger pull is a little heavy, but workable. I ordered one in 7-08. I wish I had just grabbed the 243. Would have been fun getting reloading stuff for a new caliber. Maybe I will get the 243 if I really like the 7-08 Theres a 7-08 Axis for sale in the classifieds. I talked to the guy and it only has 7 rounds through it. Just an FYI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlieNY Posted December 5, 2012 Share Posted December 5, 2012 Well I got my shot at a buck today with my Remington Model 700 in .243. Buck was coming at me through a swamp and I let him come in to my shooting lane. Buck was at 40 yds. and I put the crosshairs right behind the shoulder. At the squeeze of the trigger the buck dropped dead right there. I again was using Hornady 95 gr. SST Superformance factory ammo. Glad I did not listen to my friends who told me that a .243 was kind of light for deer. Proof is attached. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawdwaz Posted December 5, 2012 Share Posted December 5, 2012 Well I got my shot at a buck today with my Remington Model 700 in .243. Buck was coming at me through a swamp and I let him come in to my shooting lane. Buck was at 40 yds. and I put the crosshairs right behind the shoulder. At the squeeze of the trigger the buck dropped dead right there. I again was using Hornady 95 gr. SST Superformance factory ammo. Glad I did not listen to my friends who told me that a .243 was kind of light for deer. Proof is attached. Well done! Toldyaso...........<grin> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlieNY Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Here is a close up picture of my buck that went DRT with my Remington 700 in .243. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jusputtn Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 Nice buck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 6pnt. w/.243 rem. 100 gr sierra gameking. Heart shot, he jumped & went about 30 yards. So I guess we'll see the whole anti .243 / 20ga / 30-30 soapboxers around about the same time next year? Happy hunting. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle rider Posted January 27, 2013 Author Share Posted January 27, 2013 With all of the silliness of the UnSafe Act and he hoarding of components, my magic deer slaying 243 formula has been altered to: 33.5 grs of Varget with a 100 gr Hornady Interlock SP. Still puts brown down. Savage Model 14 loves the load. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawdwaz Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 (edited) Here is a close up picture of my buck that went DRT with my Remington 700 in .243. Great looking buck. Did you end up doing anything special with the head? Edited January 27, 2013 by Lawdwaz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlieNY Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Lawdwaz- am having the head done in a European mount by a local taxidermist. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomervilleSlayer Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 (edited) Lets all agree on one thing..... SHOT PLACEMENT is the absalute key. We know that a 243 will kill a deer. That round has the ballistics to do so, well. I personally prefer a larger round for myself. I am an experience hunter and shooter. I can handle recoil. What it all boils down to is what rifle can the shooter shoot most accuratley? Whatever it might be, that's the rifle to use. That is why i'm buying my son a 243 this summer to prepare him for his first deer hunt this fall. I want my son to be comfertable shooting this rifle and shooting it a lot at my range. I belive he will be able to shoot a 243 better then, lets say a 270. I know there are other cal's in between, but i think this will be the best for his light 11 year old body. Plus it will double as his coyote gun. Now when he gets older and more experienced and a larger frame on his body, i expect he will choose a larger cal rifle for whitetail hunting and i will be able to pass that rifle down to his sister(3 years younger). I have always been a fan of the smaller, faster, flatter bullets myself. I do a lot of hunting where there might be some longer shots on a buck. I don't want totell my son that he should have a bigger cal just because"the bigger cal leaves more room for error". This should not be the thought process when selecting a rifle. The thought proccess should be, what cal can i most effectivly target a bucks vitals with? And from there, you must stdy ballistics and practice, practice, practice! Like i said before, SHOT PLACEMENT IS EVERYTHING. Edited February 21, 2013 by SomervilleSlayer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.