Culvercreek hunt club Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Actually, the easiest way to do that is during a season where they already have the most efficient equipment to really do the job. That would be the regular gun season. If they were really serious about that little "doe only" fiasco, and if they truly wanted the doe population whacked on, they would have done the real obvious solution which would have been to devote a few days of gun season to "doe-only" harvesting. The deer population control has absolutely nothing to do with crossbows, or bow season. I know it, you know it, and the DEC knows it too. So no, the crossbow is not the salvation of overpopulated situations or even close. However, if that is what they are pinning their hopes on, they will be real happy to start working firearms into the bow season as they are threatening. While that is something that bowhunters would really hate seeing, I do believe that that is the DEC's end game. The crossbow push by the DEC is more likely motivated as an initial interim conditioning step to break down the bowhunter resistance as they work toward the time when the mix of firearms and bows is maximized. Seems kind of counter productive the way they went about it. The areas that are the most difficult on population control (bow only areas)were the areas they left out of the new crossbow inclusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Seems kind of counter productive the way they went about it. The areas that are the most difficult on population control (bow only areas)were the areas they left out of the new crossbow inclusion. I really question as to whether or not the people who make theses laws even know the capabilities of a compound -vs- a crossbow......I haven't done any studies, but with my limited experience with a crossbow, I'm fairly confident that if I shot my compound alongside the crossbow, the projectile from the compound would travel quite a bit further then the one from my crossbow. I'm assuming it's a safety concern with the crossbow that limits where it can be used and the discharge distance allowed...... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 I really question as to whether or not the people who make theses laws even know the capabilities of a compound -vs- a crossbow......I haven't done any studies, but with my limited experience with a crossbow, I'm fairly confident that if I shot my compound alongside the crossbow, the projectile from the compound would travel quite a bit further then the one from my crossbow. I'm assuming it's a safety concern with the crossbow that limits where it can be used and the discharge distance allowed...... But I believe the bill that is in equals the distance of the crossbow to the compound. basically makes it all the same except for the areas the crossbow isn't allowed. and to me those are probably the areas that could have used the most benefit at all. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skillet Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 But I believe the bill that is in equals the distance of the crossbow to the compound. basically makes it all the same except for the areas the crossbow isn't allowed. and to me those are probably the areas that could have used the most benefit at all. I just looked at the DEC site. It says the setback distance is 150FT for vertical bows & 250FT for crossbows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 I just looked at the DEC site. It says the setback distance is 150FT for vertical bows & 250FT for crossbows. I am not talking about the CURRENT regulations. I was tlaking about the proposed that is referenced in the post title. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skillet Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 LoL. I'm slow today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 LoL. I'm slow today. well it is Monday...wait...what? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyslowhand Posted March 29, 2016 Author Share Posted March 29, 2016 The timing of this new Xbow legislation was not ideal. Don't many of these minor legislations get attached to the new budget proposal? Then when the budget deadline reaches the 11th hour they get pealed off and never see the light of day again. Convinced the Xbow legislation that was proposed last year went the same route. Wait & see! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadKill44 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 I'm fairly confident that if I shot my compound alongside the crossbow, the projectile from the compound would travel quite a bit further then the one from my crossbow. I'm assuming it's a safety concern with the crossbow that limits where it can be used and the discharge distance allowed...... It all about initial arrow velocity regardless of what weapon is generating the power. For those looking to buy a crossbow or bow, you should pay more attention to release velocity than draw weight. Typically crossbows are higher draw weight which increases speed but shorter stroke length which reduces speed. The result with most designs, however, usually makes the crossbow a little faster a bow. Be aware that's not true in comparisons. Typical bows speeds range from 200 to 300 feet per second. Where a typical crossbow is from 250 to 400 feet per second. Again that's not saying there aren't some faster or slower. Current setbacks are 150ft (50 yds) for bow and 250ft (~84Yds) for crossbow. The new bill proposes both bow and crossbow at 150ft (50yds) setback. The more critical safety difference between bow and crossbow is in handling a cocked crossbow. One needs to be aware that a cocked crossbow is like an armed rat trap and it's one mean rat trap. The archers hands, not holding the string in tension, are free to wander into triangular string path. While shooting, a raised thumb on the hand holding the fore stock can be clipped off short. Other than that I think a crossbow is as safe as a standard bow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Roadkill. I know the legislation remove draw weight and tip to tip dimensions too but in the current regs are there any cross bows that make that 400 FPS or come close? I don't have one and probably won't. just curious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Current setbacks are 150ft (50 yds) for bow and 250ft (~84Yds) for crossbow. The new bill proposes both bow and crossbow at 150ft (50yds) setback. The more critical safety difference between bow and crossbow is in handling a cocked crossbow. One needs to be aware that a cocked crossbow is like an armed rat trap and it's one mean rat trap. The archers hands, not holding the string in tension, are free to wander into triangular string path. While shooting, a raised thumb on the hand holding the fore stock can be clipped off short. Other than that I think a crossbow is as safe as a standard bow. I don't think the setbacks and safety have anything to do with the injury one might do to ones self. I'm talking about how far the projectile will carry, I was surprised at how quickly the crossbow bolt dropped as opposed to the arrow from my compound. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 I don't think the setbacks and safety have anything to do with the injury one might do to ones self. I'm talking about how far the projectile will carry, I was surprised at how quickly the crossbow bolt dropped as opposed to the arrow from my compound. not following. Damage to ones self? you that quick to get down range ahead of the bolt? lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 not following. Damage to ones self? you that quick to get down range ahead of the bolt? lol no, but the post I quoted went into the dangers that a crossbow poses to the shooter...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 no, but the post I quoted went into the dangers that a crossbow poses to the shooter...... Got it. I misread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Man Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Those areas left out by this new legislation are done so because they are local regulations that supersede the state laws, those will need to be changed seperate. The best part about this is the x bow will need a bowhunting course to use one, a little education keeps the "slob hunters" that everyone seems to know are out there away from use of buying and signing a piece of paper... this is also why you bought a muzzleloader licence. If they had a seperate x bow license you would have to be grand fathered in, this way there is no grand fathering as now it will fall under archery and require a bow license or course to use. (Seems that the dec had this planned ahead doesn't it?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 just got an email from NY Bowhunters opposing this Bill....pretty sure I cancelled my membership when they opposed the youth season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BizCT Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 just got an email from NY Bowhunters opposing this Bill....pretty sure I cancelled my membership when they opposed the youth season. Soon they won't even be an organization. Down goes NYB!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skiop Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 just got an email from NY Bowhunters opposing this Bill....pretty sure I cancelled my membership when they opposed the youth season. Not opposed, but its pretty sad a youth season is even needed. The gov't needs to make a special season so some guy will take his kid hunting? My dad used to just take us with him anytime. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Not opposed, but its pretty sad a youth season is even needed. The gov't needs to make a special season so some guy will take his kid hunting? My dad used to just take us with him anytime. just an added bonus for guys who love hunting with their kids to be out there, I can't imagine anyone using that as the one and only opportunity to spend time with their kids....yes, sad if that's the case. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneam2006 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 I take my 5 yr old any time I want....and what he does with me is my business no one's else and know many father's like that Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skiop Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 just an added bonus for guys who love hunting with their kids to be out there, I can't imagine anyone using that as the one and only opportunity to spend time with their kids....yes, sad if that's the case. There was nothing preventing them being out there prior to that the special season 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 There was nothing preventing them being out there prior to that the special season we would hope not, but I don't know what does or doesn't prevent others from doing things...sorry if I struck a nerve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 funny how guys equate youth seasons with guys not taking their kids out any other time of the year.....that's quite the thought pattern. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Those areas left out by this new legislation are done so because they are local regulations that supersede the state laws, those will need to be changed seperate. The best part about this is the x bow will need a bowhunting course to use one, a little education keeps the "slob hunters" that everyone seems to know are out there away from use of buying and signing a piece of paper... this is also why you bought a muzzleloader licence. If they had a seperate x bow license you would have to be grand fathered in, this way there is no grand fathering as now it will fall under archery and require a bow license or course to use. (Seems that the dec had this planned ahead doesn't it?) If the crossbow is listed as archery equipment why would local regulations be required? I don't know about the NYC area but the 8c allows bowhunting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 If the crossbow is listed as archery equipment why would local regulations be required? I don't know about the NYC area but the 8c allows bowhunting yeah, I would think if crossbows get listed as archery equipment they would be fair game in any area that currently allows it.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.