HuntOrBeHunted Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Now keep in mind I just posted a link and left it at that. Take it for what you think it's worth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ford Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 I will take it for what it is worth. A Dec 15th story. What officials, names? Did they know what they were talking about, or just someone "related" to the investigation? Like I said, if it was just handguns, why could "they" (who?) just use that to ban handguns? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sits in trees Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Not surprising. At such close range on little bodies(good lord) would you expect the rounds to stay in the body? From a .223? I do not know what you guys are looking for. What is the difference even if it was handguns, would not the antis just go after them instead? When the results of the investigation become public, you think the State Police, local cops, Coroner are going to lie because Cuomo, or Obama told them to? They (100's of officers, Troopers, Detectives, Investigators), are going to risk their job, or violate their integrity for someone else? Pipe dreams. Just like every other crazy conspiracy out there. Have you come to a point in your life that being lied to or not being told the whole truth is acceptable. Or that anything an authoritative figure states on TV is gospel and that they would never have any reason to hold back information from the public to serve a bigger agenda? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ford Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Sits, What lies? What authoritve figure are you speaking of? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geno C Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 been trying to find out when this was aired... http://patriotupdate...dy-hook-or-not/ woops, saw huntorbehunted posted same lick. i saw the vid yesterday and was going to post it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 been trying to find out when this was aired... http://patriotupdate...dy-hook-or-not/ woops, saw huntorbehunted posted same lick. i saw the vid yesterday and was going to post it December 15th is when that aired. Its the same video in every link posted about this. The video of the police taking the gun out of the trunk has been showed over and over again, and it is definitely NOT an AR based rifle. It looks to be a semi auto shotgun, or a rifle with a similar type action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airedale Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 The truth on whether an AR rifle was used is huge, the whole uproar and premise of this clamoring for the banning of assault rifles was over the Sandy Hook incident. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 It has taken on a life of its own. It doesnt matter any more as far as that argument goes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony m Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 The truth on whether an AR rifle was used is huge, the whole uproar and premise of this clamoring for the banning of assault rifles was over the Sandy Hook incident. Past experiences usually demonstrate having the local authorities making the initial reports to the media. Then the Feds come in. Then there is more of what is told to the media to report. It has been brought out the Holden showed up at Sandy Hook. There is still no proof of how exactly anyone entered the school, reported looking like a armed militant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuntOrBeHunted Posted January 26, 2013 Share Posted January 26, 2013 It has taken on a life of its own. It doesnt matter any more as far as that argument goes. + 1 They took it and ran far off into the sunset. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wztirem Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 + 1 They took it and ran far off into the sunset. I guess you would have to see the crime scene photos and the coroners reports to perhaps convince yourself that an AR 15 was responsible for the multiple gun shot wounds suffered by many of the children. Do yourself a favor and file a FOIL request with the CT attorney general. Perhaps you can contact one of the parents who had to identify their child, post mortem and ask them how many gun shot wounds their child suffered! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy K Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 I guess you would have to see the crime scene photos and the coroners reports to perhaps convince yourself that an AR 15 was responsible for the multiple gun shot wounds suffered by many of the children. Do yourself a favor and file a FOIL request with the CT attorney general. Perhaps you can contact one of the parents who had to identify their child, post mortem and ask them how many gun shot wounds their child suffered! Have you seen the crime seen photos or are you just convinced that your dear old friend CNN would never lie to you ,do you believe every thing the media says? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Have you seen the crime seen photos or are you just convinced that your dear old friend CNN would never lie to you ,do you believe every thing the media says? does anyone have any factual information they'd like to share? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy K Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 The only factual info i have is watching that cop pull the firearm from the trunk with bare hands and proceed to finger bang the shit out of it , some real grade A police work ,makes me wonder what else they screwed up during the investigation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 The only factual info i have is watching that cop pull the firearm from the trunk with bare hands and proceed to finger bang the shit out of it , some real grade A police work ,makes me wonder what else they screwed up during the investigation. watching a video shot from a news copter hovering 1000 feet above the crime scene would hardly be considered factual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
13BVET Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 watching a video shot from a news copter hovering 1000 feet above the crime scene would hardly be considered factual. Well, I'm not going to speculate on the weapon used, but I do wonder as to how the ME couldn't determine how many boys, and girls he autopsied, when asked during the interview. Pretty unusual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawnhu Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 The only factual info i have is watching that cop pull the firearm from the trunk with bare hands and proceed to finger bang the shit out of it , some real grade A police work ,makes me wonder what else they screwed up during the investigation. Fine crime scene investigating right there. Without gloves no less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuntOrBeHunted Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 I guess you would have to see the crime scene photos and the coroners reports to perhaps convince yourself that an AR 15 was responsible for the multiple gun shot wounds suffered by many of the children. Do yourself a favor and file a FOIL request with the CT attorney general. Perhaps you can contact one of the parents who had to identify their child, post mortem and ask them how many gun shot wounds their child suffered! What in the world are you talking about lol ?? I was simply agreeing with what WNYBuckHunter said. In which had nothing to do with anything your talking about. I think you missed the point !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyantler Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 What in the world are you talking about lol ?? I was simply agreeing with what WNYBuckHunter said. In which had nothing to do with anything your talking about. I think you missed the point !! You'll have to excuse him because he usually does miss the point... the kool-aid he drinks must be spiked..lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuntOrBeHunted Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 You'll have to excuse him because he usually does miss the point... the kool-aid he drinks must be spiked..lol I'm just know seeing his trend. Running his lips from thread to thread. I guess I missed his point. Glad I did to I would have felt a little dumber if I stooped to his level of thinking. To bad he used to much sugar and not to many moth balls... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuckersdaddy Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 It has taken on a life of its own. It doesnt matter any more as far as that argument goes. yep. it had its rebirth during the second presidential debate. when the all caring lib lady stood up and asked what are they going to do with those nasty aks and other 'assault' weapons. The scary part was obama acted as if that was all taken care of and the cheap hand guns were the real problem. yep the scripts already written, life fills in the blanks and we get dumped on. gotta love politics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.