thunnus Posted December 19, 2014 Share Posted December 19, 2014 I won't flatter myself and claim the idea to be mine. Noticed Native American broadheads were sharpened "front and back" as were roman arrowheads But people speak about wound channels and passthroughs. Hoping if the arrow doesn't exit it may continue to slice internally, if sharpened on both sides it would certainly slice w/ greater ease if not through and through. Put an edge on my practice broadheads and will see if it makes pulling them out easier. Have any of you tried this in the field? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pygmy Posted December 19, 2014 Share Posted December 19, 2014 Nope...It seems like it would increase the chances of accidently cutting yourself, while providing questionable advantages regarding making the broadhead more effective on game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philoshop Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 It's not something I would do, but to each their own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thunnus Posted December 20, 2014 Author Share Posted December 20, 2014 Thanks guys, don't know how another edge adjacent to 2-4 sharpened blades poses significantly more danger. I hope I never have to admit that "you told me so" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thunnus Posted January 19, 2015 Author Share Posted January 19, 2015 It works, wrote a long story and lost it on tapatalk. Made a poorly placed shot -that I was sincerely ashamed of - lethal. Native Americans knew what they were doing - their lives depended on it. Next quest is to tip the arrows w/ something that prevents deer from running far that we can ingest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawdwaz Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 The pod. Google that! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 I would think the process of making and mounting the arrow heads had more to do with why they were thinned on the rear edges. whether it be flint arrow heads, thinned to more easily mount in the shaft and maybe reduce weight, or an iron Roman head that gets pounded out in the forging from the shaft to each edge. I would also think weight would have been of some concern on the iron tips. For a battle arrow head I would think they would have wanted them very difficult to pull out yet strong to pierce armor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thunnus Posted January 20, 2015 Author Share Posted January 20, 2015 At the most basic level I find it hard to argue for less cutting area inside an animal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thunnus Posted January 20, 2015 Author Share Posted January 20, 2015 The pod. Google that! http://books.google.com/books?id=wIW3LOy83aMC&pg=PA50&lpg=PA50&dq=arrow+drug+pods&source=bl&ots=tCqwpl0E5G&sig=vT_2FbJZkK5O0M9X25fSKAUvrLI&hl=en#v=onepage&q=arrow%20drug%20pods&f=false Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 Maybe if you bad the trailing edges of the blades sharpened, you might get lucky on a marginal hit and cut something vital while the arrow was moving around inside of a fleeing deer .... maybe. There also might be some element of humaneness involved in making the arrow come back out easier on non-lethal hits. I don't know, that's an awful lot of mights and maybes. I kind of doubt that any of the potential benefits would really be worth the added effort. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 The pod. Google that! http://books.google.com/books?id=wIW3LOy83aMC&pg=PA50&lpg=PA50&dq=arrow+drug+pods&source=bl&ots=tCqwpl0E5G&sig=vT_2FbJZkK5O0M9X25fSKAUvrLI&hl=en#v=onepage&q=arrow%20drug%20pods&f=false I think I read that article in 1970. Notice what kind of broad head was on the arrow? Still one of the best. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 I think I read that article in 1970. Notice what kind of broad head was on the arrow? Still one of the best. About 5 years ago, I dug through my ancient collection of broadheads and refurbished a half dozen of my rusty of Bear Razorheads, and took a nice doe with one just for the sake of satisfying some nostalgic need. Yes, they could be the one broadhead that has taken the biggest percentage of deer of all the broadheads ever invented. But anyway, the old Razorhead was the workhorse of bowhunting for a whole lot of years and still is a very capable broadhead. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbHunterNY Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 the whole blade surface is sharp on mine by design. no need to sharpen them. I on occasion use hell razors too though as I use them with my recurve. I don't and have never sharpened the back sides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thunnus Posted January 21, 2015 Author Share Posted January 21, 2015 My shot was a responsible one (quartering away, close range) the result of the shot made me ask a hunting buddy to take my bow away for the balance of the season. It was a marginal shot w/ a fantastic result that i attribute to the sharpened broadhead tearing things up inside. Shot dead-on after. A left handed shooter, I fear that the puffy winter jacket I was wearing in the stand, coupled w/ the excitement of drawing on third day had string slap arm and change arrow trajectory to the right. Through the lower back tore up femoral artery on far side (never a shot I'd wish to repeat). Arrow snapped and burrowed deeper into deer ( 3 inches at minimum), not a drop of blood greater than 15' feet from where we found'em Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawdwaz Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 I think I read that article in 1970. I remember reading that article and others. I was just a pup then but devoured what ever I could get my peanut & butter stained hands on.................................. Used those Bear heads as well as Hilbre, Howard Hill, Zwickey, Ben Pearson etc. I remember my good friend driving one of those Ben Pearson Deadheads up into the chest of a racoon that his dog treed in broad daylight. Although it took about 5-6 shots to even hit it, when it did it did the job PDQ. Remember the ads for Browning's Serpentine? Try and sharpen that corkscrew! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robby Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 I hope this picture comes out okay, my first attempt here. These heads I forged myself, they are spade shaped and sharpened all the way around. Mounted on wood from an ash tree that I sacrificed for this purpose. Robby 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomad Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 (edited) The back side of the bleeders and main blade are sharp on Stingers. Never been a problem for me. Edited March 28, 2015 by Larry302 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.