Five Seasons Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 (edited) For a long time I've only hunted with a nikon 10x25 pair of binos. they're entry level and don't weigh much but they fog easy and I've never felt they were powerful enough. Almost all but 2 deer stands dont require binos at all and my eyes are good. I mostly use them when I hunt fields for turkey in the spring, but they are always in my pack. so anyhow, i buy this pair of vortex 12x50 binos on sale for $130 unsight unseen. I get them in the mail yesterday and wow the weight difference. They are undoubtedly a nice optic, but I can't imagine carrying them in the pack. At $130 I'm not sure I have to return them as I'm sure they'll have a use, but on the otherhand they're $130 haha. so question is this. What size optics do you bring in the deer and turkey woods with you? https://www.opticsplanet.com/nikon-realtree-road-trips-wide-angle-10x25-binoculars-8204.html https://www.opticsplanet.com/vortex-crossfire-12x50-binocular.html Edited November 3, 2017 by Belo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chas0218 Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 These are mine. Great binos for the price. mine are 8x42 ,10x42 would be about as strong as I would go for hunting in NY I'm glassing maybe 200 yards at a time and that is the furthest. https://www.opticsplanet.com/alpen-pro-waterproof-8x42-roof-binoculars-380.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brownclown Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 i use vortex diamond backs 10x28. i love them. i only hunt hard woods and have never found the need for higher. if i had longer ranges i believe 10X42 for be better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marion Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 I love my Vortex Razor HDs. They cost little over 1100 when I got them went with the 10x42. They were awesome on my trip out west last year and I continue to use them hunting here. My next scope will very likely be a Vortex over a Swaro. The glass is as good if not better plus can save a couple sheckles. Sounds like you got a great pair for a great price. Plus their warranty no fault is awesome. You could literally shoot them with a gun and they will send you a replacement pair. Vortex is most excellent in my eyes.Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BizCT Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 years ago I only used 8x32's in NY (shotgun county) for deer hunting. After using 10x42's on several hunts out west, I actually still just use them here now. It's overkill, but I do like being able to specific details. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airedale Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 Like firearms for different types of hunting I have acquired different weight, styles and power binoculars for the same reasons. Open open country big game and varmint hunting I will use a good pair of 10X for glassing long distances. If I am doing a lot of walking I like compacts. For the woods it is all about field of view for me, the distances are relatively short so a good quality 6X or 7X is plenty with as wide an angle as possible. As far as brand I have been using the high end Bushnells for many years with zero complaints. Al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pygmy Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 Leica Trinivoid 8 x 42....They're a bit on the heavy side, but they are high quality, and after using quality binocs it's tough to go back to the cheaper stuff...I bought them back when I was doing a lot of out of state spot and stalk hunts, but they work just as well stillhunting deer in the woods... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moog5050 Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 8x42 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRod 8G8H Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 bushnell trophy 10x42... Pro= waterproof, durable, good price...Con= touchy focus, heavy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletch Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 8x32 I got real sick of hauling around bigger ones. Now if I'm headed west or hunting a certain rifle spot I'll bring bigger but not for daily local work. In usually trying to pick shit out brush at 50 yards.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moog5050 Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 I picked up the 8x42 leupold bx3 pro guide for under $300 shipped on eBay. Testing them side by side with the zeiss conquest, I thought they were very comparable. Great in low light. Don't fog. And size wise, they aren't much bigger than some cheap Nikon 10x25 I have. If in the market, keep an eye on eBay. Very nice overall hunting binos. Easy focus too. They still sell for close to $600 at the box stores. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny hunter Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 Same here Leopold 8x42 ..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stubborn1VT Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 8x32 Luepolds. I can't justify any more weight than that. I owned a pair of 10x32, and those were great too, but some jackwagon broke into my truck and stole them. Anything in the 8-10 power should do you. I personally wouldn't carry a pair of 42s, but I would love a pair for the truck/windowsill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trial153 Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 I am running all Swarovski ....SLC 10x42, 8x32 Els and 12x50 ELs....all depends on what or where I am hunting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five Seasons Posted November 4, 2017 Author Share Posted November 4, 2017 Thanks guys, I think you all confirmed what I already knew. 12x50 is too big lolSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 For long sits, I have a 10X42. I like look around when I'm sitting. But I find it heavy. For long hikes and stalks, I have a 8x36 monocular. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.