Jump to content

Contest Shut Down By Antis


Steve D
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, chrisw said:

I'm sure roadkill and natural causes killed deer also account for a portion of that, how much who knows?

Sent from my moto g(6) using Tapatalk
 

it doesn't even matter though. It's mother nature. A percentage of those fawns were probably weak or had issues that lead them to be coyote food. So had the yotes not got them, mother nature would have found a way. If mother nature didn't find a way in the spring, eventually the land would work it out as there is only a certain number of animals (on both sides) that a land can support and sustain.

Again, i'm not anti-coyote, but "I'm saving the deer" is an absolutely pitiful argument unless you're trapping and killing 24/7 as the studies suggest is the only way. And even then the land has to be able to support the heard. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it doesn't even matter though. It's mother nature. A percentage of those fawns were probably weak or had issues that lead them to be coyote food. So had the yotes not got them, mother nature would have found a way. If mother nature didn't find a way in the spring, eventually the land would work it out as there is only a certain number of animals (on both sides) that a land can support and sustain.
Again, i'm not anti-coyote, but "I'm saving the deer" is an absolutely pitiful argument unless you're trapping and killing 24/7 as the studies suggest is the only way. And even then the land has to be able to support the heard. 
Agreed, it can be argued that too many deer in an area is worse for the deer than coyotes are. Fawn mortality is roughly 50% both with and without predators present as studies have shown. Throw in a wet spring and fawns have a rough start regardless. I never have a problem killing 3-4 deer every year as many do the same on this site, so apparently there are enough for us and the coyotes.

Sent from my moto g(6) using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a large family near me that kills every coyote they see "for the deer". Ironically, one of them also complains about how much impact the deer are having on his crops. Expecting rational and critical thought when in comes to coyotes is expecting too much. I guess the same could be said for deer.

Coyote hunting make no difference in my neighborhood. There are always plenty of coyotes year after year, even with the hounds running all winter. I see tracks every time I go for a walk. Shooting coyotes incidentally while deer hunting does nothing at all.

With plenty of coyotes, we have way too many deer. It must be our local coyotes are completely incompetent. That is compared to vicious Delaware County monsters I've been reading about. Must be Otsego County has a different gene pool from Delaware.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Rattler said:

If you guys would be so kind as to tolerate a little doubt in research, I would appreciate it.  Research is a form of theory.  You do it and publish your findings.  You publish your findings so it can be peer reviewed.  Peer review can support or reject your research based on many factors, from methodology to conclusions.  

Couple of things.

"Peer reviewed" means that a scientific paper was reviewed by a panel of experts prior to publication, not after. Not sure if that happened here.

"Theory" as it relates to a science does not mean what it means to a layman. 

But that aside, did you pay the $10 and read the paper or are you just going off the article and the abstract?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Curmudgeon said:

Coyote hunting make no difference in my neighborhood. There are always plenty of coyotes year after year, even with the hounds running all winter. I see tracks every time I go for a walk. Shooting coyotes incidentally while deer hunting does nothing at all.

This is the best argument for supporting a coyote hunting contest you have ever made.  It obviously doesn't put them on any endangered list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually that's an argument for killing coyotes. Contests -- which may have been the original point of this thread but it's been so long ago who can remember -- are a different matter.

No one has said that you can't legally, ethically or sustainably kill coyotes. Have at it.

I have said that contests present bad optics.in 2020. Some agree, others disagree on whether it puts hunting in a positive or negative light. 

The science seems to be saying that while you think you're doing God's work and protecting deer, you're not.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Dinsdale said:

Fixed it.

Dins,

It isn't just internet forums where clear thinking on coyotes is hard to find. It's common in real life too. I talk to hundreds of hunters in person.

Even the mainstream press has its bizarre commentary. Hancock is close enough to my hometown paper - The Daily Star, Oneonta - that they wrote an editorial. The readers comments are all over the map. However, the most nuts thing I've read there was a recent piece from their outdoor ccolumnist Rick Brockway. In his column on coyotes and the contest controversy, he cited 2 examples on why they are vicious killers. One of a deer being killed by coyotes after being disabled by a car impact. The second of a buck killed by coyotes a day after it was wounded and lost by one of his hunter friends. They found it the morning of the next day, still warm. In both of these anecdotes, coyotes were blamed for causing a cruel death.  Rational thought? Hardly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, left field said:

I have said that contests present bad optics.in 2020. Some agree, others disagree on whether it puts hunting in a positive or negative light. 

The science seems to be saying that while you think you're doing God's work and protecting deer, you're not.

Contests are not about killing coyotes. Contests are about winning the "big" prize whether is a big cash payout,  new gun, fancy thermal or night vision. The number of coyotes taken in a contest will do nothing to reduce the "overall" population. There are not enough contests to have a impact on the "overall" population.

42 minutes ago, left field said:

Are you just randomly making stuff up now?

It does happen while few actually witness it. We do need to kill coyotes or live with the consequences of their kills.

 

 

fawn.jpg

coyotegetsdog.jpg

1-2019red.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...