Paula Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 http://abcnews.go.com/US/okla-woman-shoots-kills-intruder911-operators-shoot/story?id=15285605#.TwRIIoUSNgs 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deerthug Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Nice!! Two more dirtbags off the street and one of them lying 6 feet under. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
growalot Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Too bad she didn't get the other one as well...OMG...did you watch the second news story in that clip?!...It's a shame they weren't shot as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noodle one Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 God bless her , she did the right thing. To bad she didn't get the other one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fasteddie Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 I wonder what would have happened if she shot the 1st one and then shot the other in the back as he was running away ............. . I wouldn't disapprove of that but wonder if she would have been charged with anything . Good for her ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkln Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Bravo Zulu !!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deerthug Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 I don't know about Oklahoma but in NY as long as the perp is still in your house and you fear for your life you can shoot first and ask questions later. If he runs outside and you chase him and then shoot, then you can be charged probably with some degree of manslaughter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeke83 Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 If you read up on the Castle Doctrine in NY, that should answer most questions about defending yourself at home Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tughillhunter Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Glad to see the law finally took someones side in that situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 I am surprised they didn't tell us what a great person he was and show some picture of him making Holy Communion. News always tried to twist the facts and blame the victem. This one ended right!!!!!!!!!! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Indian Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Nice job momma ! There are so many skells like that out there who are up to no good, maybe this will deter some of them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Indian Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 I am surprised they didn't tell us what a great person he was and show some picture of him making Holy Communion. News always tried to twist the facts and blame the victem. This one ended right!!!!!!!!!! ya, I always love those stories when you see the Communion or Graduation pics of some perp, and upon further investigation their rap sheet is longer than a cross country road trip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTG3k Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 I am surprised they didn't tell us what a great person he was and show some picture of him making Holy Communion. News always tried to twist the facts and blame the victem. This one ended right!!!!!!!!!! You are absolutely right. Its really surprising how so many gang related killings are of straight A students, who were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Or cases of mistaken identity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paula Posted January 4, 2012 Author Share Posted January 4, 2012 (edited) I am surprised they didn't tell us what a great person he was and show some picture of him making Holy Communion. News always tried to twist the facts and blame the victem. This one ended right!!!!!!!!!! I honestly thought they were going to have his family crying at the end say how good he was and no matter what that he or anyone didn't deserve to die like that. and how scared was the other guy, he turned himself in . . . lol Edited January 4, 2012 by paula Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StripedBuck Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Thank God that she and her baby were not hurt in that forced entry situation and that she did the right thing by believing in our Second Amendment "The Right To Bear Arms". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Man Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Since when is a 12" knife used in hunting?? hunting knife??? I can't imagine trying to gut anything with a 12" knife... Glad she protected herself! feel bad hunting was even mentioned in the story.. maybe a 12" butcher knife ..... then every one could hade butchers instead of hunters... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burmjohn Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 I don't know about Oklahoma but in NY as long as the perp is still in your house and you fear for your life you can shoot first and ask questions later. If he runs outside and you chase him and then shoot, then you can be charged probably with some degree of manslaughter. Does the perp have to have a weapon and do they have to be facing you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 ]i was just reading this online and thought i would jumpon here and post then thought i better look first it might already be up lol. what a great story im glad she protected her and her baby they got what was coming to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deerthug Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Here is the link to self defense gun laws in NYS. http://selfdefenses.com/forcespray/SD-law.html In a nutshell, if you are in your house and you reasonably believe that you or someone else with you in the house is being threatened by physical force, or that the person is about to commit kidnapping, forcible rape, forcible sodomy or robbery, then you have the right to use deadly physical force (gun). There is a general duty to retreat if the perp clearly voices his/her intent to leave or terminate the crime EXCEPT if you are in your home and you are not the initial aggressor then you don't have that duty to retreat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Sorry but if you are in my house you ARE the initial agressor. Straight form an officer's mouth as advise for home protection. make sure they are in your house and make sure you kill them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 There has to be a preceived evidence of physical threat. If they're just ransacking your living room for valuables then your job hide in the closest and let them take everything. Messed up but that's how it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Elmo...you gotta get your ears checked. You mean to tell me you didn't hear him say he was going to kill you? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTG3k Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 Elmo...you gotta get your ears checked. You mean to tell me you didn't hear him say he was going to kill you? You do everything right and perp wont be around to tell his side of the story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deerthug Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 (edited) Elmo, Here is the exact wording of the statutes regarding your scenario: 2. A person in possession or control of any premises, or a person licensed or privileged to be thereon or therein, may use physical force upon another person when he reasonably believes such to be necessary to prevent or terminate what he reasonably believes to be the commission or attempted commission by such other person of a criminal trespass upon such premises. He may use any degree of physical force, other than deadly physical force, which he reasonably believes to be necessary for such purpose, and he may use deadly physical force in order to prevent or terminate the commission or attempted commission of arson, as prescribed in subdivision one, or in the course of a burglary or attempted burglary, as prescribed in subdivision three. 3. A person in possession or control of, or licensed or privileged to be in, a dwelling or an occupied building, who reasonably believes that another person is committing or attempting to commit a burglary (ransacking) of such dwelling or building, may use deadly physical force upon such other person when he reasonably believes such to be necessary to prevent or terminate the commission or attempted commission of such burglary. I certainly would consider ransacking an attempted burglary not to mention criminal trespass. I would pull the trigger first and then ask questions. Edited January 4, 2012 by Deerthug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 I stand corrected. Out of curiousity, say an invader breaks into you home. Grabs your TV and runs off. You give chase and shoot him/her in the back right while he/she is still on your lawn. Legal or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.