UpstateNomad90 Posted August 18, 2014 Share Posted August 18, 2014 Anyone else think this Remington Muzzleloader is a bit steep? I saw an ad online and have to say i'm not really that impressed with the gun and what they claim it can do. Is that 50 Gr. really worth it? http://ultimatemuzzleloader.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba Posted August 18, 2014 Share Posted August 18, 2014 all hype and a lot of cost 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpstateNomad90 Posted August 18, 2014 Author Share Posted August 18, 2014 That's what I was thinking, A lot of cash for something that doesn't seem to offer any greater advantages. But if someone does get on on the forum I would love to hear first hand what they think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjb4900 Posted August 18, 2014 Share Posted August 18, 2014 wow, can they suck any more life out of what is supposed to be a primitive sport? 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ants Posted August 18, 2014 Share Posted August 18, 2014 wow, can they suck any more life out of what is supposed to be a primitive sport? Yeah..Its starting to get stupid. 300 yard performance? Can the same be said of the 30-30, 35 Rem., 32 Win. special and some other center fires? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MACHINIST Posted August 18, 2014 Share Posted August 18, 2014 Hype,most muzzleloader will do 200-250 if the shooter spends the time working on the load and seeing where it shoots,I can shoot 300 with my Savage 10ML2 on the range but wouldn't take a shot at a game animal that far.To much to go wrong and murphy routinely kicks me in the balls!!!HA 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ants Posted August 18, 2014 Share Posted August 18, 2014 murphy routinely kicks me in the balls!!!HA Glad Im not alone LOL! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpstateNomad90 Posted August 18, 2014 Author Share Posted August 18, 2014 I have to say I am more interested in the CVA Optima V2 pistol than I would be a 300 yard muzzleloader. Just shocked me to see Remington come back into the muzzleloader game with a $1,000 gun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vizslas Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 It would seem to me that their graph is a bit skewed ...OK a lot skewed to their benifit... They claim 2400 feet per sec. With an ultra magnum load. I am getting around 2100 with a 80 grains of black horn, pushing a 245 grain Barnes spitfire mz..Of course if my gun was zeroed at what looks to be maybe 35 yards then of course it would drop an astonishing 86 inches. instead of 150 yard zero.Bad marketing job. If I am not mistaken didnt remimngton have a lot of troubles with the 700 series rifles and the saftey on them malfunctioning.. Huge cover-up by remington lawsuits and what not....I would rather buy two new guns... or a savage ...They have stoped production on the 10 ml... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 most guns that shoot 150 grain pellets, the third pellet is not burned before the bullet exits the barrel. I winder what will happen to the fourth unless it has a 40 inch barrel at least. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbuff Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Although not a fan I think there ignition system takes care of burning all four pellets. I am unsure if bh209 is recommended or not it . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tcosmic Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Buy what you can afford and shoot a lot till you know the gun well. I have seen cheap guns that were as accurate as expensive ones. Just kick like mules because their light. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ants Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 The local GM was selling the new Remingtons for 735 marked down from 1100. Guess they weren't moving very well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 Although not a fan I think there ignition system takes care of burning all four pellets. I am unsure if bh209 is recommended or not it . . Not sure if their system will burn pellets any better. There is just so much time for ignition. Take a 28 inch barrel and put 150 loose I it. Shoot over snow and look and see how much unburned powder you will see in the snow. Pellets burn harder than loose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyantler Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 Anyone else think this Remington Muzzleloader is a bit steep? I saw an ad online and have to say i'm not really that impressed with the gun and what they claim it can do. Is that 50 Gr. really worth it? http://ultimatemuzzleloader.com/ It will sell like hotcakes simply because its the latest a greatest new muzzleloader... caters to all the hunters that think spending more money makes you a better shot..lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ncountry Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 caters to all the hunters that think spending more money makes you a better shot..lol What do you mean? It doesn't?..lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 (edited) So they are selling a single shot M700 with a ramrod for $1000? There's a sucker born every minute. Just buy a used M700 in 458 WIN Mag, cut off some 458 Win Mag cases & then load it from the muzzle. With the brass sized properly, there's no reason you couldn't use smokeless powder either. Why mess with pellets? Edited December 31, 2015 by wildcat junkie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BizCT Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Remington is still a company? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 wow, can they suck any more life out of what is supposed to be a primitive sport? Iron sights only, full bore diameter conicals or patched round balls & loose powder. I would put my .54 flint against any inline with those criteria at 100 yds. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowtech2 Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Buy hart muzzleloader if you going to spend that much on a Remington. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbHunterNY Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 my ProHunter wasn't cheap but it's a 300 yard gun. wouldn't shoot at game that far though. I'm some shooters will get timid after the first shot with that extra 50 grains. got to be pretty dirty too. out past 130 I don't get a really efficient clean burn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbuff Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 (edited) I think any muzzle loader bought today can shoot 300 yards, you don't need to shell out big bucks for it. Just practice and more practice. Also don't shoot smoke less out of any muzzloader unless it is intended to do so. Bubba, I'm pretty sure Remington s ignition is intended to burn all the pellets, they copied the Keith Johnson ultimate design. I'm sure maybe a little powder can be seen in the snow at times with loose powder, maybe I'm wrong. Hankens makes a sweet ml if your looking to blow some bucks. http://www.hankinscustomrifles.com/rifles.html Edited December 31, 2015 by sbuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peepsight Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Buy what you can afford and shoot a lot till you know the gun well. I have seen cheap guns that were as accurate as expensive ones. Just kick like mules because their light. I couldn't agree more. This is the philosophy my hunting buddy had for me when I started using a M/loader two yrs. ago. He's hunted with one for yrs. I bought a T/C Impact at a real fair price and put a good scope on it ..... worked on the load and spent a decent amount of time on the bench/rest getting confident with it. I've killed two deer with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat junkie Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Also don't shoot smoke less out of any muzzloader unless it is intended to do so. http://www.hankinscustomrifles.com/rifles.html This is not a muzzle loader, it is a center fire rifle loaded from the muzzle. It meets the definition of most states as far as a legal weapon for muzzle loader seasons. There is absolutely no difference in pressure handling capabilities of a rifle loaded from the muzzle with a brass cartridge case in the breech & a CF rifle. I think that Remington is just covering their butts (rightfully so) because some Yahoo that does not understand the vastly different world of smokeless powder pressure variations might cook up something that would blow the brass cartridge head out. It would be no different than reloading smokeless powder in fixed CF cartridges that have the same safety considerations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbuff Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Smokeless Powder Muzzle Loader... HANKINS SPML-45. Scroll down.... Again please don't shoot smokeless in anything that is not intended for it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.