Jump to content

Clarification of the Draft Deer Management Plan from the DEC


burmjohn
 Share

The DEC has released some points that needed clarification on the Deer Management Plan Draft.

In reviewing comments already submitted for our draft deer management plan, it is apparent that a couple strategies of the plan need greater clarification. We have posted the following notes at www.dec.ny.gov/animals/7211.html to explain that the plan: (1) does not propose a 1-buck per hunter rule, and (2) does not propose an early muzzleloader season across the board for the Southern Zone.

1) 1-Buck Rule? - It's not in the plan.

Strategy 1.3.2 proposes to initiate a process to discontinue either-sex and antlerless-only bow and muzzleloader tags for antlerless harvest and transition to a system based exclusively on Deer Management Permits (DMPs) in all areas of the state. Some hunters have apparently misinterpreted this strategy as though DEC intends to institute a 1-buck per hunter rule. However, this is not the case. The proposal is strictly based on the need for a more sensitive antlerless harvest system, and Appendix 5.6 in the deer plan describes this need and purpose. At this point, the draft plan presents a concept for improved antlerless management. The potential tag system is not fully described, but bow and muzzleloader hunters would still be able to harvest one antlered deer during the regular season and one during either of the special seasons.

2) Early Muzzleloader Season in the Southern Zone? - It's proposed for very limited circumstances in specific areas only.

Strategy 2.2.6 proposes a possible early muzzleloader season under very limited circumstances. Some hunters have apparently misinterpreted this strategy as though an early muzzleloader season is being proposed for most or all of the Southern Zone. However, this is not the case. The strategy describes an approach to progressively increase harvest pressure on antlerless deer in areas where deer populations are above desired levels. This would be considered where DMPs are available to all hunters and additional steps are necessary to reduce the local deer population. A short, early muzzleloader season for antlerless deer is proposed as the third step of a three-step process. Based on current deer population trends, it is likely that step 1 (use of Bonus DMPs; see www.dec.ny.gov/outdoor/10001.html for an explanation of Bonus DMPs) might be appropriate for 8-12 Wildlife Management Units, mostly located in northern Regions 8 and 9. If use of Bonus Permits is sufficient, then we would not need to progress on to step 2 (make part of the bow and late muzzleloading season antlerless-only) or step 3 (a short early-muzzleloader season for antlerless deer).

The draft deer plan is available at www.dec.ny.gov/animals/7211.html. I encourage you all to carefully read the plan, form your own opinions and give us feedback.

Please remember that July 28 is the deadline for submitting comments on the draft deer management plan. Comments may be submitted in writing to DEC Deer Management Plan, NYSDEC, 625 Broadway, Albany, NY 12233-4754 or by email to [email protected] using “Deer plan” in the subject line. Please do reply to NY Big Game to submit your comments.

 Share


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



"First we pay for a bow license even if we just want to use a bow in gun season we need a license."

You don't need a bow license to use your bow during rifle season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bowhunter, but I could understand a gun hunter's sentiment if they replied: Your bow license entitles you to a lengthy season, first crack at whitetails that are largely unpressured, under weather conditions that are typically more comfortable that those experienced by gun hunters.....

Trying to see both sides here, and as I bowhunter I think we have it pretty good.....the Oct. 1 opener would be a long-awaited improvement.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bowhunter, but I could understand a gun hunter's sentiment if they replied: Your bow license entitles you to a lengthy season, first crack at whitetails that are largely unpressured, under weather conditions that are typically more comfortable that those experienced by gun hunters.....

Trying to see both sides here, and as I bowhunter I think we have it pretty good.....the Oct. 1 opener would be a long-awaited improvement.....

Can't argue with that, all true. Plus we never paid for DMP.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the crossbow will be brought in to help take those antlerless deer out on dmp's. Face it a lot of hunters will not shoot a doe!  they get the dmp but never fill it or report they filled it so the state wont issue more next year. The take for bow hunters is dismal when you look at total numbers of bow hunters in the woods. i believe many pass shots waiting for the "big one" so we are hurting ourselves in showing that bows alone are not effecient harvesting tools. The dec is mandated to controll numbers of deer and they will find tools that will accomplish this goal! if this means putting a gun season in the middle of archeery season or allow x-bows ..you bet they will do it! Ar's won't be the answer either they are there so you'll get fustrated and shoot a doe!! Shoot doe people really you wont hurt the herd they reproduce quicly (twins maybe even triplets).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I originally thought the $10 DMP application fee was a bad idea, since DEC needs us to be the management tool and could be pricing us out of the woods.....I've since had a change of heart (I prefer to use that phrase than to say I was wrong).....the $10 application fee means those who are getting DMPs are serious about using them....

make sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where I hunt its hard to kill a doe. I would love to fill my doe tags each year but its tough. I can shoot at least 10 little bucks for every doe I have a shot at. I usually let the scrub bucks walk in hopes of shooting a doe. Maybe I should quit hunting by all the buck sign  ;D

HAHAHAHA, wish I had that issue  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep I'm still on the safety issue...which isn't top on the talk list...so thought ppl that think a mere 50 yards isn't too close to shoot arrows next to someones home or livestock.

Missouri woman shot in face by nei                                                                                                                                      ST. LOUIS |          Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:56pm EDT         

    (Reuters) - An 80-year-old Missouri  woman enjoying a chocolate doughnut at her kitchen table was hit in the  face by a stray arrow apparently shot by a neighbor honing his archery  skills, police said on Wednesday.

The woman, great-grandmother  Margaret Shofner, calmly pulled the arrow out of her jaw on Tuesday  morning and put it on her table. She did not require hospitalization and  wasn't sure at first what hit her."I  pulled (the arrow) out and laid it on the table. That's when I realized  what it was," Shofner said, telling her story to local television not  long after the Tuesday morning incident."Who  would have thought an arrow was going to come into your house and hit  you," Shofner said. Her face was swollen and bruised but otherwise she  was unharmed.Police in the north  St. Louis suburb of St. John, Missouri, found nearby resident Robert  Joiner, 26, still practicing his bow and arrow shots an hour after the  shooting and was charged with second-degree assault and armed criminal  action, Capt. J.R. Morris of the St. John police said.Police  said Joiner was practicing archery with a compound bow when the arrow  apparently bounced off the hay bale he was shooting at and crashed  through Shofner's window. He was released on $25,000 bail.(Writing by Bruce Olson, editing by Cynthia Johnston)...would like the following.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well what you have here is a case of dumbass. The guy was shooting his bow toward a house, which is just plain stupid. All the laws in the world most likely wouldnt have stopped that from happening. The guy was not following basic safety rules to begin with. In Missouri, it is illegal to discharge a bow or firearm within 100 yards of an occupied structure, it is also illegal to knowingly discharge at any building or habitable structure unless doing so in self defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed....if we start molding laws in response to these types of accidents, we'll end up with a 2-mile setback requirement and a lot of other regs that will do nothing to stop incidents that are the direct result of stupidity, recklessness and negligence of the degree that no one could ever have imagined.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well see it never said he was shooting in the direction of her house....and said he was near by ...but how far n"near by"? it clearly said...

  arrow  apparently bounced off the hay bale he was shooting at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

H Well I could get BOLD print off so I'll finish here

How many of you have had an arrow deflect off a limb ..tree...or target and go in a totally different direction?....a mere 50yrds is just Too damn close to shoot near occupied buildings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well what you have here is a case of dumbass. The guy was shooting his bow toward a house, which is just plain stupid. All the laws in the world most likely wouldnt have stopped that from happening. The guy was not following basic safety rules to begin with. In Missouri, it is illegal to discharge a bow or firearm within 100 yards of an occupied structure, it is also illegal to knowingly discharge at any building or habitable structure unless doing so in self defense.

Ever wonder why we have laws that forbid shooting across the road, or the current limit of 500 feet from structures, or any number of laws against doing some stupid things. It is because there really are dumbasses out there. I know there are because I've seen them. Do such laws ever stop such stupid acts? ....... perhaps not 100%, but probably it does stop some. At the very least, it gives the law something additional to charge these stupid people with. What the heck, it's pretty stupid for somebody to get all drunked up and go flying down the expressway in the wrong direction. We have laws against all of that, and yet every so often you read about someone doing it. Should we eliminate those laws simply because such an acts are certifiably stupid? I think that just as there was justification for the 500 foot rule, it probably makes sense to at least consider whether exceptions to that law could be a move in the wrong direction, regardless of the intellect of the dumbasses that these laws are trying to control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well see it never said he was shooting in the direction of her house....and said he was near by ...but how far n"near by"? it clearly said...

  arrow  apparently bounced off the hay bale he was shooting at

Yeah he probably shot high and it bounced off the top of the haybale, ever see an arrow bounce of of a hay bale any other way? I havent. Even a 100 yard rule didnt stop this one from happening, which is why I dont think a 50 yard rule is going to help any in this type of a case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well what you have here is a case of dumbass. The guy was shooting his bow toward a house, which is just plain stupid. All the laws in the world most likely wouldnt have stopped that from happening. The guy was not following basic safety rules to begin with. In Missouri, it is illegal to discharge a bow or firearm within 100 yards of an occupied structure, it is also illegal to knowingly discharge at any building or habitable structure unless doing so in self defense.

Ever wonder why we have laws that forbid shooting across the road, or the current limit of 500 feet from structures, or any number of laws against doing some stupid things. It is because there really are dumbasses out there. I know there are because I've seen them. Do such laws ever stop such stupid acts? ....... perhaps not 100%, but probably it does stop some. At the very least, it gives the law something additional to charge these stupid people with. What the heck, it's pretty stupid for somebody to get all drunked up and go flying down the expressway in the wrong direction. We have laws against all of that, and yet every so often you read about someone doing it. Should we eliminate those laws simply because such an acts are certifiably stupid? I think that just as there was justification for the 500 foot rule, it probably makes sense to at least consider whether exceptions to that law could be a move in the wrong direction, regardless of the intellect of the dumbasses that these laws are trying to control.

Who said anything about eliminating the law? Apparently you missed my point, which is 50 yards or 100 yards, doesnt matter in a case like the one that was posted. MO has a 100 yard law, no distance law stopped this incident from happening.

Its just like the articles that were posted a while back in another thread about some moron shooting arrows into the air in a city neighborhood and people being struck by them. No distance law or even a no discharge law stopped that incident either. It was a case of stupid, and there is no fix for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's right WNYH...no law could stop ignorance but for the life of me I don't under stand how so many men can look at an issue and have complete and udder tunnel vision...but it happens a lot here...not a slam just my observation....

this being a case in point...no it can't stop idiots but when those idiots cause bodily harm to another human they now have a leg to stand on in court for medical bills...loss of livestock or even life....

One more point to this and hey look it up please...but NYS DEC and courts already set a president where a guy was ticketed  and subsequently fined for harassment for making noise on his land while the neighbor bow hunted....at the time I believe he was mowing or cutting wood....what ever...now he may have been trying to disrupt the guys hunt....BUT now what happens when a guy sets up to bow hunt 50yrds off your back deck and you want to mow...play the stereo....have a party....cut wood...target shoot to get ready for gun?...mind you ....ppl doing these things tend to do them after work...right when guys hit the woods...so now you have a president where ppl can be arrested and fined for such things during actually any season for cross bows are in gun season...and some guys hunt with bow during gun...I'm sure no one on this forum is naive enough to think that won't happen....we aren't in a love they nieghbor society any more.....Hunting is 7 days a week....ppl in this state have a right to do as they wish on there lands with in the law...... hunting has no right to even come close to being able to take that away....changing to 50 yrds is what that will do to many ppl in this state...mark my words

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some things missing from.  If an arrow glanced off a hay bale and by the time it reached the house how did it penetrate the house?  Unless the lady was sitting there in front of an open door or window.  Pulling an arrow out of your jaw and only having a bruise and some swelling.  How do you pull an arrow out of your jaw and not have a hole in it?  It doesnt say she pulled it out of her mouth.  Im confused on this whole story.  She must have stole the guys arrow and beat herself across the jaw with it and called the cops on the dude for revenge of sorts lol. This just makes no sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's right WNYH...no law could stop ignorance but for the life of me I don't under stand how so many men can look at an issue and have complete and udder tunnel vision...but it happens a lot here...not a slam just my observation....

this being a case in point...no it can't stop idiots but when those idiots cause bodily harm to another human they now have a leg to stand on in court for medical bills...loss of livestock or even life....

One more point to this and hey look it up please...but NYS DEC and courts already set a president where a guy was ticketed  and subsequently fined for harassment for making noise on his land while the neighbor bow hunted....at the time I believe he was mowing or cutting wood....what ever...now he may have been trying to disrupt the guys hunt....BUT now what happens when a guy sets up to bow hunt 50yrds off your back deck and you want to mow...play the stereo....have a party....cut wood...target shoot to get ready for gun?...mind you ....ppl doing these things tend to do them after work...right when guys hit the woods...so now you have a president where ppl can be arrested and fined for such things during actually any season for cross bows are in gun season...and some guys hunt with bow during gun...I'm sure no one on this forum is naive enough to think that won't happen....we aren't in a love they nieghbor society any more.....Hunting is 7 days a week....ppl in this state have a right to do as they wish on there lands with in the law...... hunting has no right to even come close to being able to take that away....changing to 50 yrds is what that will do to many ppl in this state...mark my words

I hope you dont think Im slamming you in any way, Im not. Im just saying that no law prevented that incident. As far as you getting ticketed for hunter harassment, the judge has to see intent of the party to harass the hunter. Say for example, the guy mowing his lawn is flipping the hunter off, or something like that, then its harassment. Someone mowing their lawn or cutting wood while you are in a tree near their property is not considered harassment on its own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey ya know our congress is pretty much gonna decide on our fates and wether or not we have a financial existance, any social security and if we have to pay for our medical expenses with our homes and property when we are 65, and i sit here and seem more concerned about what the heck they are going to do with my hunting season!!! :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently you missed my point, which is 50 yards or 100 yards, doesnt matter in a case like the one that was posted. MO has a 100 yard law, no distance law stopped this incident from happening.

I think I replied to that comment when I said: "Do such laws ever stop such stupid acts? ....... perhaps not 100%, but probably it does stop some. At the very least, it gives the law something additional to charge these stupid people with."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so the guy was already in violation of the law to begin with 100 yard rule ini missouri. i still dont see a problem with 50 yards. most normal people will be shooting away from buildiings. you cannot not let others do something because of a few idiots. using that reasoning no one would be allowed a gun either because it might accidentally go off.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably it is because of the rural area that I live in, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would actually want to even hunt within 500 feet of someone else's house even with (and perhaps especially with) a bow. Personally, I would feel like I was infringing on other people's private space if I was skulking around their house that close. I had occasion to actually measure off 500' from my house once and was surprised just how close that actually is. It is close enough to hear conversations. It is close enough to watch cars come and go in the driveway. It is close enough to have someone's dog barking in your face all during your hunt. It is close enough to have any number of normal private activities that would just trash my hunt. I know hunting land is getting tough to come by, but are people really serious about wanting to hunt in other people's yards? I cannot imagine a situation that would supply a worse quality of hunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You wouldnt be hunting in anyones yard unless you had permission, and I can think of one spot, on my fathers land, in a rural area, where I could put a stand that I cant now. Its just under 300 feet away from one house, and 400 away from another. It would be a great spot in an inside corner, where you cant even see either house, and deer walk within 20 yards of it almost every day. It has a perfect tree in it that I used in the past for my practice stand. The old neighbor didnt care, but then sold his house and this new guy gave me crap about it even though I dont shoot or in any way face his yard or home when I was shooting targets. Hes just one of those people that like to try and throw his weight around. Now Im not saying I would hunt in that spot, but it would be nice to get my practice stand back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking about the bow season for next year and having to apply for a DMP because there will be no either sex tags issued with your bow license. I know the reason for this because a bow hunter can hunt in any DMU he chooses and shoot a doe in any area he wants. An the Dec would not have any control over how many deer are taken in a given area. What about the DEC leaving the bow license alone, still issue the either sex tags. But it's  issued for only one DMU this way DEC will know how many DMP to issue. And could charge more for the tag.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...