Jump to content

NY DEC: 2013 Deer Harvest Results are In


burmjohn
 Share

Hunters harvested approximately 243,550 deer during the 2013-14 hunting seasons, nearly equivalent to the statewide take last year, state Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Commissioner Joe Martens announced today.

“Governor Cuomo’s NY Open for Fishing and Hunting Initiative offers many hunting opportunities statewide for sportsmen and sportswomen for the growing population of deer,” said Commission Martens. “Throughout the state, hunters play an essential role by helping to maintain healthy and ecologically sound deer populations.”

The 2013 deer take included approximately 128,850 antlerless deer (adult females and fawns) and about 114,700 adult bucks (1.5 years or older), both estimates being within 4 percent of the 2012 take (see table below). Hunters in the Northern Zone walked out of the woods with roughly 32,300 deer, including 19,500 adult bucks. In the Southern Zone, excluding Long Island, hunters took 208,300 deer, including about 94,200 adult bucks. To compare these harvest estimates with other past seasons, go to: http://www.dec.ny.gov/outdoor/42232.html.

This year marked New York’s second Youth Deer Hunt, held over Columbus Day Weekend. During the Youth Deer Hunt, 14 and 15-year-old junior hunters could take one deer, antlered or antlerless, with a firearm when properly accompanied by a licensed and experienced adult mentor. An estimated 8,860 junior hunters participated in the Youth Deer Hunt, resulting in 1,275 deer taken (728 adult bucks and 547 antlerless deer). A photo gallery showcasing successful junior hunters is atwww.dec.ny.gov/outdoor/85926.html.

More Antlerless Deer Need to be Taken

This year’s harvest shows a continuing trend of concern to DEC deer managers. In many Wildlife Management Units (WMUs), including portions of southeastern New York and the Lake Plains region of western New York, harvest trends indicate that deer populations are too high - above levels recommended by local stakeholder groups who live, hunt or manage land in those areas. Even with very liberal opportunities for take of antlerless deer, not enough females are being taken to reduce populations to desired levels. In these areas, DEC and hunters must begin considering new ways to the increase antlerless deer take to achieve deer populations that are compatible with ecosystem health and consistent with the public’s interests.

Older Bucks Becoming a Larger Portion of Adult Buck Harvests

Hunters took a record number of bucks (approximately 55,300) aged 2.5 years or older in 2013. These older bucks, which many hunters desire, accounted for 48 percent of harvested adult bucks statewide in 2013, compared to only 33 percent (45,350) in 2000 when New York’s deer population peaked, and only 28 percent (about 33,000) in the early 1990s. In part, this is influenced by the overall size of the deer population, which in much of the state is larger than desired. Although mandatory antler restrictions in 11 WMUs in southeastern New York are a contributing factor, many New York hunters outside those areas are voluntarily choosing not to take young bucks, thereby letting these bucks get another year or two older before they are taken.

Deer harvest data are gathered from two main sources: harvest reports required of all successful hunters, and DEC staff’s examination of nearly 16,200 harvested deer at check stations and meat processors. Statewide harvest estimates are made by cross-referencing these two data sources. Much additional information about the 2013-14 deer harvests, including charts and maps describing the harvest, is available on DEC’s website at www.dec.ny.gov/outdoor/42232.html.

Governor Cuomo’s NY Open for Fishing and Hunting Initiative is an effort to improve recreational opportunities for sportsmen and sportswomen and to boost tourism activities throughout the state. This initiative includes streamlining fishing and hunting licenses, reducing license fees, and improving access for fishing and increasing hunting opportunities in New York State.

In support of this initiative, this year's budget includes $6 million in NY Works funding to support creating 50 new land and water access projects to connect hunters, anglers, bird watchers and others who enjoy the outdoors to more than 380,000 acres of existing state and easement lands. These 50 new access projects include building new boat launches, installing new hunting blinds and building new trails and parking areas. In addition, the 2014-15 budget includes $4 million to repair the state's fish hatcheries; and renews and allows expanded use of crossbows for hunting in New York State.

This year's budget also reduces short-term fishing licenses fees; increases the number of authorized statewide free fishing days to eight from two; authorizes DEC to offer 10 days of promotional prices for hunting, fishing and trapping licenses; and authorizes free Adventure Plates for new lifetime license holders, discounted Adventure Plates for existing lifetime license holders and regular fee Adventure Plates for annual license holders.

View attachment: 2013deerl.png

 Share


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



I agree its not as simple as just ARs but its better then nothing at all. Especially for the areas I hunt... Education along with ARs for 3H have done wonders. The biggest educational impact has been ARs itself, people now see what happens when you let them grow. Ideally the end all be all is to have some more mature bucks with a balanced age structure. Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

 

We hunt opposite ends of the spectrum. Here, education has been the biggest impact in not needing ARs as a last ditch effort or preventing them from being initiated, despite attempts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We hunt opposite ends of the spectrum. Here, education has been the biggest impact in not needing ARs as a last ditch effort or preventing them from being initiated, despite attempts.

I wish that was the case here. I'm all for OBR as well but just as ARs wouldn't work in all areas neither would OBR. Though it could help.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish that was the case here. I'm all for OBR as well but just as ARs wouldn't work in all areas neither would OBR. Though it could help. Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

 

ARs would need to be a 4 a side to move the allotted % to the 2.5 yo bucket here. That didn't fare well in PA - many or all of those areas have been moved back to 3, and i think that was a big mistake. Any place that needs 4 a side certainly doesn't need ARs imo. Eastern NY, 3 a side protects the allotted %.

 

I'd cringe at the idea of a 3 a side here. If I ever get time, I'll have to post a pic of a 1.5 I shot when I was younger. 12 points. Of all the 1.5s I shot in my time, only one would not have met the 3 a side rule. When I was plugging them, I was plugging what walked by first, so I wasn't picky.

Edited by phade
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, the internet doesn't show emotion or any of the important tangents of conversation. You think I am name dropping and I'm simply giving you context when you tell me I don't know a thing about rudimentary deer biology from a state POV.

The fact is, if you blindly follow agency dictations, you set yourself up for failure on a macro level. NY was there 10 years ago and it was horrible. Saying people need to go fill all of their tags or face snipers is silly talk. They issue more tags knowing that they won't be filled. They don't want 100% of their tags that they issued filled. If they did, we'd have a herd disaster. The emphasis needs to be on accurate management practices with a balanced approach to population control. Just because a tag exists doesn't mean it must be filled. Legally you have every right, but that's completely different.

You pick and parse...

I never said follow the agency blindly (or questioned your creds)...I'm saying on a macro level they have better info then the individual. Manage the herd you hunt locally, but be aware of the larger picture.

In terms of pop control the DEC just released their intended message...Fill More Tags, only 15% are being filled and that is too low. Ofcourse they don't want all 650,000 tags filled....they don't want to hand that many out, they have to.

You are the one who advocated prioritizing "buck time" to herd management. What page is that in the QDM handbook?

Edited by Meat Manager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ARs would need to be a 4 a side to move the allotted % to the 2.5 yo bucket here. That didn't fare well in PA - many or all of those areas have been moved back to 3, and i think that was a big mistake. Any place that needs 4 a side certainly doesn't need ARs imo. Eastern NY, 3 a side protects the allotted %.

I'd cringe at the idea of a 3 a side here. If I ever get time, I'll have to post a pic of a 1.5 I shot when I was younger. 12 points. Of all the 1.5s I shot in my time, only one would not have met the 3 a side rule. When I was plugging them, I was plugging what walked by first, so I wasn't picky.

I agree a one size all dosent work here. Different environments, situations, and pressures.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You pick and parse...

I never said follow the agency blindly (or questioned your creds)...I'm saying on a macro level they have better info then the individual. Manage the herd you hunt locally, but be aware of the larger picture.

In terms of pop control the DEC just released their intended message...Fill More Tags, only 15% are being filled and that is too low. Ofcourse they don't want all 650,000 tags filled....they don't want to hand that many out, they have to.

You are the one who advocated prioritizing "buck time" to herd management. What page is that in the QDM handbook?

 

I prioritize going after bucks that make me happy. I'm no longer willing to spend more time than I do on doe harvest currently in exchange for seat time for the ones I seek. The more does I shoot, the less time I spend chasing a buck. I shot two doe. That's good enough for my contribution toward the overall picture. Go ahead and keep saying my model doesn't work. If everyone shot two doe, we'd be in trouble. So go pound sand. You keep lamenting me for my aversion to shooting 6 or 7 doe a season, yet my two doe were higher than the state average. Hmmm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of meat, I really need to get my ass in gear with my sausage making this year lol

You really didnt print this language on a family read website?   I believe many have been spanked by you for even doing this A$$!!!

 I should know seeing that you threatened me with it many times.  Try and keep it clean will ya?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know some DEC reps for some WMUs are reluctant to give the amount of permits you actually need.  they don't give them out because they don't think you'll be able to fill them and they don't want too many taken in a small area.  I've been open to taking doe for a while now and usually take a couple each year and figured that was alright.  now I realize about 30% should be taken.  when I drive in my car or am out in the woods and count the deer as green up happens, I'm in awe at the realized number of deer that would need to be taken.  most have a mentality that was far from taking does than even mine was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally the biggest issue in handling the local population booms in the deer herd is access. If the hunters can't get to the deer, a tractor trailer load of tags won't help. I think the 150' change was set to help that but I sure would like to see some active role out of DEC to assist in access. Don't know how it could be done but that is my take.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally the biggest issue in handling the local population booms in the deer herd is access. If the hunters can't get to the deer, a tractor trailer load of tags won't help. I think the 150' change was set to help that but I sure would like to see some active role out of DEC to assist in access. Don't know how it could be done but that is my take.

Hunter Access Programs exist here in the Northeast as well. I agree that the more available land the better.

I help manage a 6000+ acre chunk east of Pittsburg...I personally posted much of the property with Cooperation Wins signs provided by PA DCNR:

http://www.paforestry.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/GN201109-Hunter-Access-Program-1.pdf

http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt?open=514&objID=620379&mode=2

Here in NY there are a few FWMA Cooperatives: post-1622-13986005502376_thumb.jpg

Jersey opens up a lot of very small suburban parks to bows (NY & PA also do this): http://www.co.hunterdon.nj.us/hunting/instruct.htm

DMAPs are the best local population management tool, but they require concerned and educated land owners or land managers.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Meat Manager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory the dmap permit system should be an excellent tool.. From what I have seen it is an easily abused system used by the local farms to devestate a local herd. On average they view the deer as vermin not as a source of food and enjoyment.. these same farmers will let very few if anybody hunt.

Edited by ncountry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory the dmap permit system should be an excellent tool.. From what I have seen it is an easily abused system used by the local farms to devestate a local herd. On average they view the deer as vermin not as a source of food and enjoyment.. these same farmers will not let very few if anybody hunt.

I'd say that's a sweeping generalization and I would point to Nuisance Tags as the real problem as there are no limits to them where DMAPs are simply antler-less permits used in season.

I will also repeat my original statement which considers the qualification of concerned land owners/managers:

"DMAPs are the best local population management tool, but they require concerned and educated land owners or land managers."

The main thrust of my post is that when private land owners care about conservancy they can help control pops by granting access AND administering DMAPs.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Meat Manager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say that's a sweeping generalization and I would point to Nuisance Tags as the real problem as there are no limits to them where DMAPs are simply antler-less permits used in season. I will also repeat my original statement which considers the qualification of concerned land owners/managers: "DMAPs are the best local population management tool, but they require concerned and educated land owners or land managers." The main thrust of my post is that when private land owners care about conservancy they can help control pops by granting access AND administering DMAPs. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I would have to completely agree with everything you said.     Like I said ,"from what I have seen" It does not seem to work as well as planned. Just my personal experience. Nuisance or destroy permits are even worse.  Imho

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory the dmap permit system should be an excellent tool.. From what I have seen it is an easily abused system used by the local farms to devestate a local herd. On average they view the deer as vermin not as a source of food and enjoyment.. these same farmers will let very few if anybody hunt.

You are correct. It cost me an average of $500 to raise one adult deer on my farm a year. Most deer in Ny are fed by the farmer. If you do the math of how many deer in the state times the $500 bucks?  I could see the vermin statement and some farmers with the..Kill them like rats thoughts... The state makes all the money and the farmers take the hit.

 

Like down in the tier where we hunt, The farmers we hunt on want them all dead and dont care about tags. They will let you hunt but they also gut shoot them at night when they get the chance. The ones that dont let you hunt either hunt themselves or get big dollars from lease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said it before crossbows are part of the Dec solution to population control..we as bow hunters tend to wait for a buck (I do it as well) by including and hopefully bringing in new hunters(crossovers from gun now really new) that tend to have if its brown its down mentality will hopefully decrease doe population. The big problem is the either sex tag. They should probably lose it and issue doe tags for those archers who wish to have them..this will help in setting true DMP numbers needed in an area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really didnt print this language on a family read website?   I believe many have been spanked by you for even doing this A$$!!!

 I should know seeing that you threatened me with it many times.  Try and keep it clean will ya?

 

Youd be wrong on that. Feel free to try again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory the dmap permit system should be an excellent tool.. From what I have seen it is an easily abused system used by the local farms to devestate a local herd. On average they view the deer as vermin not as a source of food and enjoyment.. these same farmers will let very few if anybody hunt.

 

DMAPs all have to be reported, etc. I think you are talking about DDPs or nuisance tags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DMAPs all have to be reported, etc. I think you are talking about DDPs or nuisance tags.

They only have to be reported if recovered and tagged. I know of two places that the marginal shots are made on purpose and there is not attempt at recovery. No reporting needed in that scenario. Seems like such a waste and I think the DDP's should be done away with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They only have to be reported if recovered and tagged. I know of two places that the marginal shots are made on purpose and there is not attempt at recovery. No reporting needed in that scenario. Seems like such a waste and I think the DDP's should be done away with.

Any system can be abused...if caught those who abuse will be prosecuted. If someone has gone to the trouble to get and administer dmaps they are most likely not abusing.

Nuisance tags are the actual problem and should be done away with as they don't require a sinister plan to do serious damage to a herd.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They only have to be reported if recovered and tagged. I know of two places that the marginal shots are made on purpose and there is not attempt at recovery. No reporting needed in that scenario. Seems like such a waste and I think the DDP's should be done away with.

 

The same goes for your regular tags though. Id bet far more deer are shot and unrecovered from guys trying to fill regular tags than DDPs and DMAPs combined. I honestly dont see any issues with DMAPs, but havent had much involvement with DDPs, so I cant say much about those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the DEC have available the deer population densities they recommend for each DMU? Do they have what the current deer population for each DMU is?

 

I think a lot more hunters would use their DMP's if the DEC would actually come out with #'s and showed hoe "over" populated we are with deer.

 

But then again they might not want to show those #'s to hunters!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is about as truthful and a bridge for sale in the desert.....

 

 

How does the state know the overall population of live deer and its breakdown? That is needed to make the cal more deer have to die unless you have folks filling your pockets just to say that.

 

They guess at over 50% of the take (call it statistically backed but it is an unknown) and claim to age enough deer at processors for these numbers.... nope, not buying.

 

Great to see the 40,000 yearly buck take....... how sad is that?

 

Maybe the youth enrollment in hunting jumped 5% too. I am willing to buy some squares for next years take results....theyve probably been assembled already anyhow

 

The only thing worse than this report is know folks believe it

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...