Jump to content

SC Justice Breyer is out.

Grouse
 Share

Recommended Posts

Grouse Grand Master

Grouse

Posted
Posted (edited)

Eighty-three-year-old Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, a Bill Clinton appointee, is being forcibly retired by bloodthirsty partisans after nearly 28 years on the High Court. The lack of an official announcement yesterday from the Court itself is remarkable, and it tells us a great deal — namely, that Breyer himself wasn't ready to make the announcement.

In a faux show of solidarity, Breyer will attend Joe Biden's remarks on his retirement at 12:30 this afternoon. But make no mistake: He's being put out to pasture; he's being kicked to the curb in favor of an as-yet unnamed black woman. So it goes in the race-obsessed world of the Left.

How do we know Breyer's replacement will be a black woman? Because Joe Biden promised as much on the campaign trail, and because White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki confirmed it yesterday: "The president has stated and reiterated his commitment to nominating a black woman to the Supreme Court and certainly stands by that."

Moreover, Biden will choose the next Supreme Court justice based on skin color and female chromosomes because that's what he and his fellow Democrats have been reduced to: buying votes by doling out identity-based favors. Frankly, you have to wonder how Biden's obsession with racial preferences has been working out — especially his promise to choose an "African American" woman as his vice president.

Douglas Andrews

Edited by Grouse
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grouse Grand Master

Grouse

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

They're are not being excluded.  They are being given preference.  That's crazy.  It automatically limits the pool of candidates based on race and gender, eliminating many far more qualified candidates.  Reagan was wrong to do it too.

 

Edited by Grouse
Link to comment
Share on other sites
suburbanfarmer Veteran

suburbanfarmer

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, left field said:

Can you try harder?

I usually dont get involved in the political threads but when I do its because of remarks like yours.

It truly is a tale of two Americas

 

1% want to rule it.

90% are too busy sleeping/ignoring what's happening around them.

4% carry out the the agenda for 1% 

5% are trying to wake up the 90% to realize what is happening.

In Essence 5% vs 5%

The question is what percentage you fall under?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shoots100 Mentor

Shoots100

Posted
Posted (edited)

And Joe Biden wonders (If he can remember anything from the past nowadays) why he gets opposition on anything to do with Supreme court nominations ?

The Biden Rule

And why just limit your choices to two percent of available candidates ?

According to a 2021 profile of the legal profession by the American Bar Association, just 4.7 percent of American lawyers are Black and 37 percent of lawyers are female. The report did not break out Black women in particular, but the implication is that roughly 2 percent of American lawyers are both Black and female.

Luckily he didn't say he was going to nominate a black female transgender candidate !

 

 

Edited by Shoots100
Link not viable from WSJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Robby Veteran

Robby

Posted
Posted

Progressive democrat socialists, which today means all of them, don't want a supreme court that holds enacted laws against the Constitution and decides their legitimacy, they want an old soviet style politburo. Bye bye Breyer, POS!

Wake up!!!!!!!!

Robby

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grouse Grand Master

Grouse

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

"Ironically, it is against federal law to begin a job search by announcing that only people of a certain race will be considered and that all people of other races will be rejected. The Supreme Court itself has been clear on that matter. As Justice Lewis Powell wrote in the 1978 Bakke case, 'Preferring members of any one group for no reason other than race or ethnic origin is discrimination for its own sake. This the Constitution forbids.'" —Gary Bauer

"Hate to break it to you but the only black person serving on the Supreme Court today was personally attacked, defamed and slandered by Joe Biden before he voted AGAINST him." —Benny Johnson

Edited by Grouse
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Four Seasons Veteran

Four Seasons

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Grouse said:

"Ironically, it is against federal law to begin a job search by announcing that only people of a certain race will be considered and that all people of other races will be rejected. The Supreme Court itself has been clear on that matter. As Justice Lewis Powell wrote in the 1978 Bakke case, 'Preferring members of any one group for no reason other than race or ethnic origin is discrimination for its own sake. This the Constitution forbids.'" —Gary Bauer

"Hate to break it to you but the only black person serving on the Supreme Court today was personally attacked, defamed and slandered by Joe Biden before he voted AGAINST him." —Benny Johnson

Exactly. But people like the cook will overlook 50 years of pulling that kind of crap along with a failed vice presidency and proof of family getting rich on his name and still vote him in just because he does not like the guy that had this country at the top and it’s people succeeding.  

Edited by Four Seasons
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...