Jump to content

Deer baiting


Naturegirlfromny
 Share

Recommended Posts

While I was at Dick's a couple weeks ago I noticed a couple young men at the checkout buying big 5 gal pails of some sort of deer feed/attractant. I asked them as a fellow hunter why they buy it. They mumbled something about "building up the deer". Then practically ran out of the store. Why do stores sell this stuff marketing specifically for feeding to deer when it is illegal to feed deer or hunt near or over a bait pile? I am just a little confused! Maybe more experienced hunters can clear this up for me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like they were masters at baiting!! :lol: It is illegal to use bait for deer, or feed deer, with any store bought bait at all. My cousins dumb arse just got fined for this , used corn and his neighbor turned him in. Lost his doe he just shot and the tag plus 250 dollar fine. Only exception is food plots which are legal baiting. I find that most people who bait illegally in NY are also prone to Tresspass and poaching so its just like drugs. You start out lite with baiting and then you'll see what else you can get away with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/7197.html

Part 189 of Title 6 of the Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York was last amended on July 28, 2010. Part of this rule restricts the feeding of deer and moose.

In New York, it is illegal to feed deer and moose by putting out any material that attracts them to feed.

There are five exceptions to the rule:

  1. Agricultural crops including wildlife food plots.
  2. Distribution of food to livestock.
  3. Distribution of food to captive deer and elk.
  4. Cutting of trees and brush.
  5. Scientific research, wildlife damage abatement, and wildlife population reduction programs, but only under a permit issued by DEC.

What is the penalty for violating the feeding regulation?

The penalty for illegally feeding deer or moose is a violation punishable by a fine of up to $250 and 15 days in jail for each day of the offense. Multiple offenses may result in the revocation of hunting, fishing and/or trapping privileges for up to five years

(f) Feed or Feeding means the act of using, placing, giving, exposing, depositing, distributing or scattering any material, or any act to maintain the availability of such material, that attracts wild white-tailed deer to feed on such material including the distribution of such material in deer wintering areas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As some what stated before, it is not illegal for these items to be sold by store, what do they care they are just trying to make a profit. Another example is broadheads, store sell all kinds even the one classified as illegal in New York State.

For the stores it's all about the money. Then it's on the consumer to know if the items purchased are legal or not for hunting purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have bought some mineral licks for use in Ohio and also Virginia where it is/was legal.

A good mineral lick is a great way to get pics during the summer. But, being illegal for use here doesn't mean illegal for sale. Immoral? Maybe, but then there are legit uses to a very small degree.

It's on the buyer, not the seller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As usual it turns to a bash food plots. I love the generic stuff that hunters who plant food plots trespass and all that. I have turned down 4 deer this week, because they were close to the neighbors line, and did not want to risk them crossing over. You might want to get some facts before you spew the crap. And I find in my area that if I plant food plots, I have more people trespassing on me to try to shoot a deer in one.

Edited by bubba
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ironically, the stores are actually not supposed to sell those items in New York. When they first passed the laws forbidding "baiting" or "feeding", there was a memo instructing the stores to take it off the shelves. Wal Mart actually pulled it under the new guidelines, along with other stores. Wonder how they're able to sell it again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got fined 2 years ago for "BAITING" i was hunting turkey in a corn field that was just freshley spread with manure and ENCON said it was bait.

Wow! There was literally a corn field, and you still got hit with a baiting charge??? That doesn't make any sense!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got fined 2 years ago for "BAITING" i was hunting turkey in a corn field that was just freshley spread with manure and ENCON said it was bait.

That makes no sense at all . A person could hunt over crops ( corn , beans , apples , etc. ) and it would be legal unless the product was it in a pile .

I also call BS on the above post .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As usual it turns to a bash food plots. I love the generic stuff that hunters who plant food plots trespass and all that. I have turned down 4 deer this week, because they were close to the neighbors line, and did not want to risk them crossing over. You might want to get some facts before you spew the crap. And I find in my area that if I plant food plots, I have more people trespassing on me to try to shoot a deer in one. Besides why would I need to respass when my evil food plots are drawing deer in for at least a 20 mile radius to my property.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no it doesnt. Walmart here before season had "nutrition blocks" and deer cain liquid and concentrate. It went off the shelves very quickly.

That's pretty strange. I was actually working at Wal Mart in Fishkill at the time, in sporting goods, and we were told to pull it. Of course, I note how you stated that it flew off the shelves.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

by flew off the shelves, I meant it took a week and it was gone. My daughter works there. I asked her about it she said it is legal to sell not legal to use. They were supposed to inform every purchaser of that. So they put up a sign

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By mike rossi
      Should an Indiana couple go to jail for saving Bambi?
      That's the question surrounding the case of Jeff and Jennifer Counceller, who rescued an injured fawn and nursed it back to health at their Connersville, Ind., home. The couple now faces the possibility of jail time and fines after state officials charged them with a misdemeanor for harboring the animal.
      Jeff Counceller, a police officer in Connersville, and his wife were charged with unlawful possession of a deer, a misdemeanor that punished to its fullest extent could put the Councellers in jail for up to 60 days and cost them up to $2,000 in fines.
      (ABC News) The couple rescued the deer more than two years ago after finding it on their neighbor's porch. The Councellers said the deer had sustained injuries, and they wanted to nurse it back to health.
      "I could feel all of the open wounds all along her back side and she wouldn't stand up," Jennifer Counceller told ABC News.
      They brought the deer home and named her Little Orphan Dani.
      The Councellers said an Indiana Conservation Officer stopped by their home and discovered the deer this past summer. The Indiana Department of Natural Resources wanted to euthanize Dani, saying she might be dangerous and a threat to people.
      "I was devastated. I spent a year and several months nursing her into adulthood, getting to the point where she was able to go out on her own," Counceller said.
      On the day Dani was to be put down, the Councellers said she inexplicably escaped from their backyard. Even though Dani disappeared back into the wild, the Councellers' legal problems didn't go with the fawn.
      The Indiana Department of Natural Resources said it couldn't comment on pending litigation but that it did discourage people from taking in injured wildlife. This case could go to court next month, and if charges aren't dropped, it will be left for a jury to decide whether the Councellers broke the law.
      "No matter what the law is, we did what was right for the animal," Counceller said.
      Meanwhile, the story has caused uproar on the Internet. A Facebook support page has more than 6,400 "Likes" in support of the couple. An online petition to drop the charges already has more than 3,800 signatures.
      Rick on Change.org wrote, "An act of humanity should not be rewarded with a sentence."
      Michelle on Facebook wrote, "They are being punished for having compassion and showing kindness."
      The Councellers' case could go to court next month.
      Also Read
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...