First-light Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 Government overstepping it's boundaries, next let's ban gum chewing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fasteddie Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 Nothing smells worse than walking out of a building and have to walk past 3 - 4 people milling around blowing smoke . But .......... as far as the Government goes ....what a turn-around . It wasn't too long ago our government was subsidizing the tobacco growers ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geno C Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 No offense smokers but i wont miss the smoke lol. i hate smoke really but it is crazy how they can pass these laws... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
First-light Posted February 3, 2011 Author Share Posted February 3, 2011 I don't smoke either but yea it's crazy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 I quit smoking, and I dont like the smell, but I think any outdoor smoking ban is way over the line. Please, the air quality in NYC sucks anyway lol. (Not why I oppose it, just saying) I personally feel that the indoor ban is over the line as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuzzyLoader Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 Before we know it, it'll be illegal to smoke in tree stands or the entire woods. I don't smoke (quit in '70)... but I believe the govt. is overstepping it's bounds [again]. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr VJP Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 I do not smoke, but I think this is a perfect example of the government moving towards an unpopular, or unconstitutional, objective with baby steps. They start off with what most people consider a "reasonable" infringement on a perfectly legal activity, then step by step, they eliminate the activity all together. Remember how seat belt laws started as "advisories"? Can you see the parallel to gun control laws here? Be careful when the government asks you to accept any limitation on your freedom. History proves that is never the limit they expect you to accept in the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloke Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 Do we have any freedom left? Soon there going to tell us when to wipe our usses Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sits in trees Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 anything to hinder big tobacco is fine with me, besides it might keep these slob arsed cigarette smokers from littering the streets with their lovely cigarette butts. tired of seeing those things all over the streets and in front of every building entrance way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr VJP Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 I guess they decide to enforce the laws they want to, and not laws like littering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
landtracdeerhunter Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 Maybe these goverment officials have to much time on their hands, so they have to create work for themselves. Then again, with the population decline in New York, maybe we have to many goverment officials. By the way, I have never been a smoker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveB Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 Do we have any freedom left? Soon there going to tell us when to wipe our usses I'd hope that's one most could handle on their own? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shu9265 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 What are they gonna dream up next ? I quit smoking back in the 80's. If people want to smoke, I don't care. I don't criticize them. But, really what's next ? No more drinking coffee ? No more doughnut shops ? No more kids toys with there meals, cause it makes them fat ? No more beer, cause it makes people watch football ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyantler Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 I quit smoking cigarettes in the 80's .. but i love a good cigar... the government seems to forget who pays for those parks and beaches... some of those tax payers are smokers..... private entities should be able to ban whatever they like. But, until they make smoking illegal I would think that smoking in a publically funded areas (especially outdoor areas) should be legal. It all started with the ban on smoking in a bar or restaurant... where the government told a private business owner that people could not smoke in HIS establishment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasons75 Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 I am a smoker...though I'm on my 4th attempt at quitting..... I only smoke outside and in the car....I'm fine with Theban on smoking in public buildings... I Never smoked in a restaurant even when we could or my own home but banning smoking in parks..... I think that's going to far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny hunter Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 I too am an X smoker,But I do enjoy a cigar.I know this is smoking,But I smoke in my car or in my garage.Or on the deck at night.Anyway I think this is crazy.And I hate to think whts next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyzmine Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 way to many ppl with too much time on their hands. they have nothing better to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wztirem Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 Its not the effect of second smoke that worries me, instead i am more concerned with the effects of having to listen to second hand rap music ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny hunter Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Both great points! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 You know what's really amazing is that the government doesn't have the nerve to simply declare tobacco an illegal drug. Instead they go through all this devious nonsense of harrassment and financial punishments trying to further their experiment in human behavior modification through taxation and harrassment. What is frightening is just how perfectly those tactics are working. The success that they have had with tobacco has worked so perfectly, that there is no reason to suspect that it will not be repeated on other citizen activities. What is even more amazing is all the cheering and celebrating that goes on from the citizenry when this government tactic is used. Let's see how popular this sort of behavior modification is when they start working on other things that they feel are social problems, like perhaps obesity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fasteddie Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 I too am an X smoker,But I do enjoy a cigar.I know this is smoking,But I smoke in my car or in my garage.Or on the deck at night.Anyway I think this is crazy.And I hate to think whts next. I could never stand the smell of a cigar and wondered how folks could smoke them . To me , it smelled like the Land Fill was on fire . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr VJP Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 They're already doing a number on alcohol and drinking. That's a natural 2nd act to follow the cigarette war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 They already made that mistake with alcohol, I highly doubt they will do that again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH41 Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 I do not smoke, but I think this is a perfect example of the government moving towards an unpopular, or unconstitutional, objective with baby steps. They start off with what most people consider a "reasonable" infringement on a perfectly legal activity, then step by step, they eliminate the activity all together. Remember how seat belt laws started as "advisories"? Can you see the parallel to gun control laws here? Be careful when the government asks you to accept any limitation on your freedom. History proves that is never the limit they expect you to accept in the end. Exactly!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr VJP Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 They already made that mistake with alcohol, I highly doubt they will do that again. Actually, they learned what they did wrong with prohibition. they went for a total ban. This time they will allow possession and consumption, but only under set conditions. And those conditions will be you have to drink it at home and stay home when you do! : Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.