Jump to content

US Capital Lock Down


Recommended Posts

But Joe Biden voters did have parades so I would not be so quick to group people up by the way they voted. Some people voted with their pocket book and on policy's and some people voted on personalities and feelings on both sides. I personally voted for the policy’s and my pocket book which made trump the better of the two picks for me. That said I would probably enjoy a beer and conversation better with Obama also I would not even want Joe Biden around my house or kids.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Versatile_Hunter said:

Just smart enough to beware of false prophets (or to not walk around with someone else’s flag). 

Look, there’s no basis for the belief that this election was stolen. It’s categorically false. The process has played out in the courts and the conclusion is that Trump is lying to try to either change the election outcome or to remain relevant after Jan. 20. If you’re still walking around talking about votes in suitcases, you’re not much smarter than those who stormed the Capitol. 

Advocates of racial justice do not advocate for rioting - it undermines the cause! There is truth to the idea that racism gives rise to the horrific acts of police violence that we have witnessed. Many of these cases are still playing out in court. The election outcome is settled. Republican judges and attorneys general have concluded that these were fair elections. To equate BLM to Trumpism is as wrongheaded as marching with a flag bearing a politician’s name. 


 

You may be right about the election fraud , idk. I think that were was significant fraud based on credible anecdotal allegations referencing it but it may not have been enough to have changed the outcome . I know that I became very disillusioned with Trumps leadership Vis-à-vis COVID around June / July And actually considered voting for Biden come November . I did change my kind afterward because I feel like he rallied a bit ( and , of course , a host of other reasons , most notably , his other incredible accomplishments !!) but , in retrospect , I wonder how many people there were out there , like me , that were a bit shaken by the COVID stuff and were willing to at least entertain the notion of voting Democrat ? enough to affect the outcome of the Election? Maybe 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 9jNYstarkOH said:

But Joe Biden voters did have parades so I would not be so quick to group people up by the way they voted. Some people voted with their pocket book and on policy's and some people voted on personalities and feelings on both sides. I personally voted for the policy’s and my pocket book which made trump the better of the two picks for me. That said I would probably enjoy a beer and conversation better with Obama also I would not even want Joe Biden around my house or kids.

 

Yeah, identical to the pictures above... 
This was a socially distanced car rally leading up to the election. To be honest, I think that’s weird too. But half the cars there were Prius so that makes it ok ;)

Look, it’s clear that the dems and reps have a very different relationship with flags in trucks, we don’t have to hash that out further. It’s the blind fanaticism that’s so disconcerting. Especially at this moment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Northcountryman said:

You may be right about the election fraud , idk. I think that were was significant fraud based on credible anecdotal allegations referencing it but it may not have been enough to have changed the outcome . I know that I became very disillusioned with Trumps leadership Vis-à-vis COVID around June / July And actually considered voting for Biden come November . I did change my kind afterward because I feel like he rallied a bit ( and , of course , a host of other reasons , most notably , his other incredible accomplishments !!) but , in retrospect , I wonder how many people there were out there , like me , that were a bit shaken by the COVID stuff and were willing to at least entertain the notion of voting Democrat ? enough to affect the outcome of the Election? Maybe 

Not to ruin the moment but by incredible accomplishments you mean 370,000 dead and 2 impeachments? 

But you’re absolutely right, an unprecedented number of lifelong Republicans endorsed Biden. It’s crazy to think that with minimal tempering of his language, Trump could have won and Republicans could’ve held on to the Senate. But like McConnell said, the election outcome wasn’t even close. 

Edited by Versatile_Hunter
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Versatile_Hunter said:

Not to ruin the moment but by incredible accomplishments you mean 370,000 dead and 2 impeachments? 

But you’re absolutely right, an unprecedented number of lifelong Republicans endorsed Biden. It’s crazy to think that with minimal tempering of his language, Trump could have won and Republicans could’ve held on to the Senate. But like McConnell said, the election outcome wasn’t even close. 

Well , we can debate his accomplishments For sure but I am not surprised by what you said about Republican support in the election for Biden considering my own  feelings Back in the summer . I Definitely didn’t like the “refusal to wear a mask “ statement at the time -thought it sent the opposite message that we needed from Our leader - and I didn’t like all the rallies being held with the cases still elevated the way that there were . 
And i think that ultimately, he paid a price for that reckless behavior . Too bad cuz , otherwise , I thought that he was very good. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Northcountryman said:

Well , we can debate his accomplishments For sure but I am not surprised by what you said about Republican support in the election for Biden considering my own  feelings Back in the summer . I Definitely didn’t like the “refusal to wear a mask “ statement at the time -thought it sent the opposite message that we needed from Our leader - and I didn’t like all the rallies being held with the cases still elevated the way that there were . 
And i think that ultimately, he paid a price for that reckless behavior . Too bad cuz , otherwise , I thought that he was very good. 

But it’s precisely during a crisis that a president is tested and when their leadership matters. He failed and the election results reflect that. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, cachemoney said:

Amazon Web Services will be dropping Parler as a customer as of Sunday the 10th. 

They are probably done now as Google and Apple have removed them from their app store as well. 

Where will all the neo nazis and Q nuts go for their indocrination now ?

Neo Nazis and Q nuts ? Wow 

And % wise , what is your best guess estimate as to the make up of right wing / conservatives as a group that Are Neo Nazis Or Q Anon believers? Would it be the same % of Communists/ Socialists/ Anarchists that actually comprise the Left / Liberals ?  Or , would it be Greater ? Less maybe?

That is absolute nonsense . 
 

I liked your other post before with the YouTube clip as Proof of indoctrination much Better !! 
 

Another thing :  I would be very careful about applauding the silencing of free speech towards ANY group and ESPECIALLY for those you disagree with. For that line that is drawn by the silencers  is dynamic and ever changing and eventually , could include your speech As well . Be warned !! 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The % in the real world or on Parler ?

I don’t know, but if it’s only .01 percent, isn’t that too much for either ? I am pretty fine with privately owned companies refusing to do business with other companies that are ok with being the meeting places to stage coups, foment insurrection or plan crimes. That’s what capitalism is about right ? Choosing who you do business with, the same as a baker being able to refuse service to a gay wedding.

When the government starts doing the muzzling, I will think differently, but that’s not what’s happening in this instance. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, cachemoney said:

The % in the real world or on Parler ?

I don’t know, but if it’s only .01 percent, isn’t that too much for either ? I am pretty fine with privately owned companies refusing to do business with other companies that are ok with being the meeting places to stage coups, foment insurrection or plan crimes. That’s what capitalism is about right ? Choosing who you do business with, the same as a baker being able to refuse service to a gay wedding.

When the government starts doing the muzzling, I will think differently, but that’s not what’s happening in this instance. 

I feel the same way which is why all private businesses should be able to, open up fully .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the question we should all be asking today.

While the words “conservative” and “liberal” are ubiquitously used to describe Republicans and Democrats respectively, these words properly should describe whether one advocates for the conservation of our Constitution, as originally intended, or its liberal interpretation by judicial activists. Does one want to conserve Constitutional limits on the central government, or liberate those limits?

Our Constitution established a Republic intended to reflect the consent of the governed, a nation of laws, not men. Article IV, Section 4 state unambiguously, “The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government…”

At the close of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked if the delegates formed “a republic or a monarchy.” He responded, “A republic if you can keep it.”

To that end, John Adams wrote, “A Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever.”

The greatest threat to that Freedom and Liberty, is from a Socialist Democrat Party and their cast of Leftist NeoCom cadres.

Anyone who can't see that is in denial of reality.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liberal columnist Glenn Greenwald resigned from The Intercept, a website he co-founded in 2013. He did so because it refused to publish his latest column until "all sections critical of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden" were removed.

Above all else, this is what the 2020 election was all about.

With the possible exception of the Civil War era, America is as divided as it has ever been — by design.

That division has been cultivated by a cadre of billionaire oligarchs intent on precipitating the "fundamental transformation of the United States" into a construct where they maintain absolute power. Nothing has better abetted that effort than the corporatist media they fully control and its now wholly transparent effort to censor information inimical to the interests of that oligarchy.

Fear — be it in the form of dire predictions about a Chinese virus exploited for political repression, or the implied threats of nationwide rioting if their preferred candidate loses the election — has been their most potent weapon of choice.  Equally integral to their efforts is orchestrated distraction. It is not even remotely accidental that memes such as "systemic" racism, critical race theory, "widespread" police brutality, white "privilege," and black "victimhood" have become media staples regurgitated by academia, professional sports, Hollywood, virtue-signaling corporations, and the Democrat Party — to the point where everything has become politicized.

What brought the nation to this point? The 2016 victory of a political neophyte who, despite his transparent character flaws, completely upended the political class's conventional "wisdom" that was anything but and the seemingly inevitable trajectory of the globalist agenda Hillary Clinton's victory would have assured.

In turn, Americans witnessed the exposure of an unelected, unaccountable shadow government, wholly in service to oligarch interests to the point of widespread corruption, even in the nation's foremost law enforcement and intelligence agencies. They witnessed the ongoing revelation that millions of ordinary Americans are considered so "deplorable" they merit no consideration whatsoever, that justice is "selective," and that "patriotism" and "national security" are anachronistic terms for "citizen of the world" elitists who view them as impediments to their personal wealth and power. They witnessed the reality that many members of the political class, irrespective of whether they have a "D" or an "R" next their names, are virtually indistinguishable from each other when it comes to accommodating the globalists' desire for open borders and massive amounts of legal and illegal immigration — and the tacit approval of non-assimilation that enables the further erosion of our national ethos and cohesion.

For the progressives who drive all of this, nothing is sacrosanct — not the size of the Supreme Court, the composition of the Senate or its filibuster rules, the Electoral College, or even the Constitution itself, which is derided as the fever dreams of dead, slave-owning white men of privilege whose efforts should literally be obliterated. This will happen one toppled monument after another until a communistic Year Zero is realized — with all its attendant totalitarian permutations, even those wholly at odds with biological and chromosomal reality.

Quite simply, Donald Trump was the way forward. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris — who will likely replace Biden at the first opportunity — are the way back. Back to a well-documented history, littered with the millions of corpses socialist/Marxist governance has invariably produced.

The difference this time around? A historically unprecedented level of censorship and surveillance provided by their Leftmedia/Big Tech collaborators — and a pre-established template for draconian lockdowns, for any reason deemed necessary.

If Americans are ignorant enough to put people who despise this nation in charge of it, they should expect nothing less.

Arnold Ahlert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Rack Attack said:

I'm sorry but you're just a moron, you contribute nothing to any conversation I've ever seen you post in on this forum.  Look it up, the cars don't meet US safety standards.

And I should taket he opinion of a deranged Trump zombie seriously?

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna26444467

 

You're not even worth responding to. I will ignore you from here on out.

Edited by wildcat junkie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, cachemoney said:

The % in the real world or on Parler ?

I don’t know, but if it’s only .01 percent, isn’t that too much for either ? I am pretty fine with privately owned companies refusing to do business with other companies that are ok with being the meeting places to stage coups, foment insurrection or plan crimes. That’s what capitalism is about right ? Choosing who you do business with, the same as a baker being able to refuse service to a gay wedding.

When the government starts doing the muzzling, I will think differently, but that’s not what’s happening in this instance. 

Yes , you’re right and I agree but , unfortunately , they’re actions are not consistent . Because , while They express moral outrage at the President and for his conduct , they did not have any problem with all of the posts / tweets back in the summer and fall in support Of the planning/ preparation and planning of the BLM / Antifa riots . Where was the outrage then I ask? And so ,Consequently ,  many on the right  see there Current efforts as clear bias ( which it clearly is) and hypocritical. If , their only purpose is to prevent the planning: fomenting of riots And other such mayhem , then they would have banned both groups equally , which they’d Did not . So , It is clear from this inequality that They have obviously have an agenda and that, as long  as the rioting is in support of political positions they agree with , then it’s ok with them , no matter how much property is damaged , people and police are injured and killed , etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, cachemoney said:

The % in the real world or on Parler ?

I don’t know, but if it’s only .01 percent, isn’t that too much for either ? I am pretty fine with privately owned companies refusing to do business with other companies that are ok with being the meeting places to stage coups, foment insurrection or plan crimes. That’s what capitalism is about right ? Choosing who you do business with, the same as a baker being able to refuse service to a gay wedding.

When the government starts doing the muzzling, I will think differently, but that’s not what’s happening in this instance. 

And that lady lost a lawsuit for not making a cake so probably a bad pick to compare it to. Twitter was used to plan riots all year and you can still find things like these on Twitter 

 

 

809D6017-A69A-4B0B-9864-75AE5D39EE9D.jpeg

Edited by 9jNYstarkOH
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, 9jNYstarkOH said:

And that lady lost a lawsuit for not making a cake so probably a bad pick to compare it to. Twitter was used to plan riots all year and you can still find things like these on Twitter 

 

 

809D6017-A69A-4B0B-9864-75AE5D39EE9D.jpeg

Nice , good job!! This is exactly what I’m talking about .  The double standard is abundantly clear here , is it not? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...