Jump to content

Why wasn't this a lung shot?


Core
 Share

Recommended Posts

I mentioned this in my original post about this deer but it's bothering me, because this is not the first deer I've hit exactly where I was aiming and been shocked to see it not immediately keel over. I hit this earlier in the month with a Rage broadhead. Entry on the left obviously, and exit on the right. This deer ran approximately 150 yards before expiring and had a consistently light blood trail the whole way. Not a spec of blood in the mouth, which tells me both lungs were fine. Also I do recall checking the heart and I had not hit it. 

How could this shot have been better? 3" higher? Did I go just under the lungs? Or was it exhaling and the chest cavity down low is temporarily empty? 

DeerEntry.JPG.3c027db40e676497ad4f1665084a3edf.JPG

DeerExit.JPG.ce4b2ff5dd65ac8f5436c49be6d5fa29.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took 2 does so far, both from a treestand, both were complete pass thrus, both were center punch heart shots. One went a little over 75 yards and other about 100 yards. Their will to survive is extraordinary, once they are hit it takes literally seconds for them to go 100 yards.  Even perfect  hits may require persistence on your part. If i didnt hear the arrow crush thru bone, ribcage and them running with front legs low you would think they were never hit. Even after many , many years of hunting i still shake my head in amazement. I have complete respect for these animals.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like entry may have missed or clipped top of one lung, that exit looks like a heart shot especially with that forward down angle. Like i noted earlier, they can run far even with a centerpunch heart shot. Sometimes you have to take membrane off heart and wipe away blood to see the shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, moog5050 said:

Entrance looks great if its not a steep shot.  You may have hit nearside lung and not far.  I like Nomad's suggestion to aim for exit.  I also don't hunt 30' up because it does shrink the kill zone.

That and there’s no Redwoods to hang stands on in Mendon .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NYBowhunter said:

Good lord who the hell would go 30' up in a tree to kill a deer? Thats insane, all my treestands are approx. 10" to 18' max. 

You should see some of the stands that were set on the property I bought.  Scared me just looking up at them.  lol  We usually use 14' ladder stands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NYBowhunter said:

Good lord who the hell would go 30' up in a tree to kill a deer? Thats insane, all my treestands are approx. 10" to 18' max. 

I forgot who it was,but last year i was talking with a guy here that loved his stands at 40'. i said he was crazy,i was working on scaffolding that height then,and the kill zone gets really small,unless you shoot no closer than 40'. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BowmanMike said:

I forgot who it was,but last year i was talking with a guy here that loved his stands at 40'. i said he was crazy,i was working on scaffolding that height then,and the kill zone gets really small,unless you shoot no closer than 40'. 

In all my years hunting there has be absolutely no need to go above 16". But thats me.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, moog5050 said:

You should see some of the stands that were set on the property I bought.  Scared me just looking up at them.  lol  We usually use 14' ladder stands.

Same here most my ladders, tripods, box blinds are 10 -16'. I have one homemade  stand thats about 16' up in a tree but because it sits at the edge of a ditch its height is probably more like 22- 23'. Theres really no need that i can think of to be 30-40' up in a tree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Culvercreek hunt club said:

I am at a loss on this post. The deer was dead and had to have been gutted. What did you hit? The answer was right in front of you

some people do not know internal anatomy. ran. into a hunter near my.uncles in east otto who had hit a deer i helped them track it and we found a nice 1.5 basket rack dead.. i watched the hunter gut and place the lungs into a bag telling me how he loved to eat the liver and these would be dinner that night..thought he was joking but watched him drag deer and his bag of lung away leaving liver and heart in the gut pile... still smh thinking about it years later...

  • Like 4
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, G-Man said:

some people do not know internal anatomy. ran. into a hunter near my.uncles in east otto who had hit a deer i helped them track it and we found a nice 1.5 basket rack dead.. i watched the hunter gut and place the lungs into a bag telling me how he loved to eat the liver and these would be dinner that night..thought he was joking but watched him drag deer and his bag of lung away leaving liver and heart in the gut pile... still smh thinking about it years later...

Not overly sensitive to different foods but lungs sounds pretty darn disgusting.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mean to pile on here but Culver Creek is exactly right. Postmortem inspection will tell you what you did right and what you did wrong. It's important to know what you hit, and why you may have missed what thought you may have been aiming at. Elevation and angles and all that stuff.

The last buck I shot with a bow from a tree-stand was moving pretty quickly right under me and I was running out of room to swing the bow. I took the shot because he was twelve feet under me and I was confident I could hit his liver. Cut it right in half and watched him circle around and die right under my stand. Had I gone for a heart or lung shot it would have been a complete whiff. I know where the vital organs are. It's probably the most important thing I learned very early on.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, moog5050 said:

Not overly sensitive to different foods but lungs sounds pretty darn disgusting.

My Grandmother used to pickle and can all of the organs from deer, cows, pigs, everything...It was never my favorite food, but it wasn't bad. Filling the pantry was the primary concern with subsistence living.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, G-Man said:

some people do not know internal anatomy. ran. into a hunter near my.uncles in east otto who had hit a deer i helped them track it and we found a nice 1.5 basket rack dead.. i watched the hunter gut and place the lungs into a bag telling me how he loved to eat the liver and these would be dinner that night..thought he was joking but watched him drag deer and his bag of lung away leaving liver and heart in the gut pile... still smh thinking about it years later...

Might have been my uncle on my Moms side.  He never did much deer hunting but always knew my Dad loved deer liver (my Dad was a Chef).  SO he told my Dad he got a deer and saved the liver for him.  So the families all got together and he gave my Dad the frozen liver.  Dad thawed it out to cook it and yeah ....... it was a lung.  Dont think he ever told him either. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...