Jump to content

Vaccination

johnplav
 Share

Recommended Posts

SportsmanNH Experienced

SportsmanNH

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Chef said:


So do you think he will run again in 2024 and if so what does it say about the Republican Party if he wins the primary


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have a better question Chef . What does it say about the Democrat party for voting for this brainless incoherent weakling incompetent fruitcake we have now for President and his cabinet of some of the dumbest assholes on earth that should all resign immediately . Especially WOKE Blinken. He is not WOKE. He is asleep at the wheel like Biden. They probably share a bunk bed room down in the White House basement. 

Edited by SportsmanNH
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 4.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

johnplav
johnplav

My daughter wearing her mask at daycare.  Protest away little one!

The_Real_TCIII
The_Real_TCIII

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

moog5050
moog5050

I will not tell anyone what they should do.   I will simply mention that my wife is in ICU right now battling COVID.  She had an already reduced immune system from a very difficult war with cancer she

Posted Images

BizCT Grand Master

BizCT

Posted
Posted
Im assuming you’re serious. One of my best friends was a die hard liberal and has the same sentiments.  He has swung to the other side cause he said the party has gone bananas. 

Same here. I have friends who were Dems until the left went so wacky they are sick about it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SportsmanNH Experienced

SportsmanNH

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Versatile_Hunter said:

This is a tragic exploitation of the ignorant. Don’t take ivermectin.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/26/us/covid-ivermectin-arkansas-doctor/index.html

https://www.foxnews.com/health/fda-warns-against-ivermectin-covid-treatment

I believe you know there is an actual human prescription of Ivermectin , right ?

This happened in NY and these families fought and won in NY Supreme Court to have their loved ones that were dying on ventilators get doses of it. They were dying and it saved their lives.

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/ivermectin-wins-in-court-again-for-human-rights/article_98d26958-a13a-11eb-a698-37c06f632875.html

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Versatile_Hunter Experienced

Versatile_Hunter

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, SportsmanNH said:

I believe you know there is an actual human prescription of Ivermectin , right ?

This happened in NY and these families fought and won in NY Supreme Court to have their loved ones that were dying on ventilators get doses of it. They were dying and it saved their lives.

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/ivermectin-wins-in-court-again-for-human-rights/article_98d26958-a13a-11eb-a698-37c06f632875.html

 

Starting with the very first sentence you can tell that your article is suspect. That’s not how science works. If someone’s about to die, sure, authorize what you will as a last ditch effort to save them. Perhaps the drug will rescue them. Perhaps they’ll die. Or maybe they weren’t going to die and hopefully the drug won’t interfere with recovery.

There are clinical trials underway to test the efficacy of this drug and  others. Let’s see how they play out before offering miracle cures that lure desperate fools into taking animal meds or idiot doctors into prescribing them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SportsmanNH Experienced

SportsmanNH

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Versatile_Hunter said:

Starting with the very first sentence you can tell that your article is suspect. That’s not how science works. If someone’s about to die, sure, authorize what you will as a last ditch effort to save them. Perhaps the drug will rescue them. Perhaps they’ll die. Or maybe they weren’t going to die and hopefully the drug won’t interfere with recovery.

There are clinical trials underway to test the efficacy of this drug and  others. Let’s see how they play out before offering miracle cures that lure desperate fools into taking animal meds or idiot doctors into prescribing them. 

But the prescription version of this drug was not animal meds. Its been given millions of times to save peoples lives in Africa and South America. And the human version that was administered to those that fought to have their loved ones get it in these court cases is batting 1000 . In the charts in that article I believe it showed that it saved 86 percent of the patients that were deathly sick and on the verge of dying. But you are right. You need the clinical trials to test the waters before diving in . But it sure would be a plus if it was proven not to be just plain coincidence . 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SportsmanNH Experienced

SportsmanNH

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, Versatile_Hunter said:

Starting with the very first sentence you can tell that your article is suspect. That’s not how science works. If someone’s about to die, sure, authorize what you will as a last ditch effort to save them. Perhaps the drug will rescue them. Perhaps they’ll die. Or maybe they weren’t going to die and hopefully the drug won’t interfere with recovery.

There are clinical trials underway to test the efficacy of this drug and  others. Let’s see how they play out before offering miracle cures that lure desperate fools into taking animal meds or idiot doctors into prescribing them. 

Making another post because I didn't add the link to the studies and trials already performed or are still in process . Now some of you guys in the medical field would be able to decipher what the charts show better than me , a real estate developer and builder. But if I'm not mistaken , these charts from 63 studies show a strong benefit to Covid patients both preventing Covid and curing patients that have advanced sickness.

https://ivmmeta.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
phantom Experienced

phantom

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, SportsmanNH said:

I have a better question Chef . What does it say about the Democrat party for voting for this brainless incoherent weakling incompetent fruitcake we have now for President and his cabinet of some of the dumbest assholes on earth that should all resign immediately . Especially WOKE Blinken. He is not WOKE. He is asleep at the wheel like Biden. They probably share a bunk bed room down in the White House basement. 

Its the medias  fault really and big tech you know  if you type in  idiot in google images search trump comes up lol 

How can you compete with that much media corruption that  they even messed with the image search on google .

So your average guy who does not really watch much news or even understands  how they are being tooled around just goes with what ever main stream media says half the time .  They only put out story's  that help the side they want to win most the time. Biden is just so much of a clown they have trouble covering up for him. If  people really were getting the whole story on this guy and his crack head son  his poll numbers would be 0 % .  The number 2 and 3 Nancy are just as bad . 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Four Seasons Veteran

Four Seasons

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Versatile_Hunter said:

Starting with the very first sentence you can tell that your article is suspect. That’s not how science works. If someone’s about to die, sure, authorize what you will as a last ditch effort to save them. Perhaps the drug will rescue them. Perhaps they’ll die. Or maybe they weren’t going to die and hopefully the drug won’t interfere with recovery.

There are clinical trials underway to test the efficacy of this drug and  others. Let’s see how they play out before offering miracle cures that lure desperate fools into taking animal meds or idiot doctors into prescribing them. 

  You talk. Suspect???   And you use CNN as your go to?  Perfect!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Buckmaster7600 Mentor

Buckmaster7600

Posted
Posted
d3d3c5d28715d3200ba6b5b6ec4587d9.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dudes an idiot! I’ve yet to talk to anyone that thinks some people shouldn’t get the shot.

If you’re old, have other health issue, are fat, etc I think you should get as many shots as you can!

I haven’t gotten it because I’ve had covid and think the risk of not having the shot and getting it again is smaller than the risks that come with the shot…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BizCT Grand Master

BizCT

Posted
Posted

Dudes an idiot! I’ve yet to talk to anyone that thinks some people shouldn’t get the shot.

If you’re old, have other health issue, are fat, etc I think you should get as many shots as you can!

I haven’t gotten it because I’ve had covid and think the risk of not having the shot and getting it again is smaller than the risks that come with the shot…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

+1. The vaccine is a great option. Keyword option


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
9jNYstarkOH Mentor

9jNYstarkOH

Posted
Posted (edited)

Honestly how loose is the FDA’s definition of a vaccine if you need a booster every 6 months and it doesn’t stop you from contracting and spreading the disease. What efficiency numbers are acceptable? It seems as if this is a new screwed up new definition of a vaccine at best. Anyone with a link to the FDA’s definition of a vaccine.@Biz-R-OWorld does this make any sense to your brother. @knehrke you seem to be very informative on this subject any insight on the history of the FDA’s definition of vaccine.

Edited by 9jNYstarkOH
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chef Grand Master

Chef

Posted
Posted
Honestly how loose is the FDA’s definition of a vaccine if you need a booster every 6 months and it doesn’t stop you from contracting and spreading the disease. This seems as if this is a screwed up new definition at best. Anyone with a link to the FDA’s definition of a vaccine.[mention=871]Biz-R-OWorld[/mention] does this make any sense to your brother. [mention=654]knehrke[/mention] you seem to be very informative on this subject any insight on the history of the FDA’s definition of vaccine.

A friend who is a DR explained it to me. And what he said is they should have been more upfront from
The beginning. When they give two doses like that up front so close together it is not conducive to lonh term immunity but is for fast immunity. So they took a gamble that getting antibodies in enough people fast could slow the pandemic. They always knew a 3 more spaced out dose would have to be given for longer immunity they just didn’t know how fast it would Wayne.

This is from a friend not media or anything


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...